Really don't mean to sidetrack or anything this thread. I think the stuff discussed is really awesome, just from my experience with a master thesis it should include something "novel". Just asking what is this "novel" part in what you are planning to do? If this is a project for a masters degree, then forget my question :)

Thanks.
On 9/20/11 9:05 AM, Jiri Svitak wrote:

The thesis would be aimed at verifying Drools Java code. With Findbugs you can find bugs in every Java project, but in this case the Findbugs would use user defined bug patterns (based on JIRAs/Bugzillas).
Drools verifier is intended to verify correctness of user's DRL using static analysis.

Model checking is more difficult to do. It executes code, so I would have to create environment for it to run, for example an application which uses Drools. Then verify some property of the system.

On 09/19/2011 06:18 PM, Mauricio Salatino wrote:
Exactly, I thought that the main point is verify the correctness of the Rules, If I misunderstood that sorry..
If you are talking about only finding bugs in the Drools code, it will be the same as finding bugs in any other project right?

I'm just curious..

Best Regards!

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@gmail.com> wrote:

On 19 September 2011 17:57, Mauricio Salatino <salaboy@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Jiri,
Drools Verifier do that for you? Am I right?

I think this is a misunderstanding. Looking at Drools' Java code takes a Java bug finding program such as findbugs. What Drools Verifier does is: look at DRL code written by Drools users.

Findbugs applied to Drools code is a good idea, but I would opt for this to include fundamental code that's used by Drools and responsible for a considerable number of JIRAs.

-W

Toni Rikkola is the man behind drools verifier, you can talk with him to improve what he has now. I know that Esteban was also playing with that and adding the concept of Working Set. You can talk with him as well.

Cheers

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Ansgar Konermann <ansgar.konermann@googlemail.com> wrote:

If I'm eligible to vote, please go for option 1.

Am 19.09.2011 17:14 schrieb "Jiri Svitak" <jsvitak@redhat.com>:

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

--
- CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
- MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- Co-Founder @ http://www.jugargentina.org
- Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar

- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

--
- CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
- MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- Co-Founder @ http://www.jugargentina.org
- Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar

- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev