Can you get us a unit test demonstrating this, and we’ll look into it as a priority.

Mark
On 28 Mar 2014, at 15:40, kellyajp <[hidden email]> wrote:

> We have upgraded from Drools 5 -> Drools 6.01 and when repeating the
> processing in each environment we have very different object counts that is
> causing memory to run out on Drools 6:
>
> Below is an extract from a heap dump
>
> In Drools 6 the main objects in the heap are
> 1:       4378006      700480960  org.drools.core.reteoo.RightTuple
>
> Where as in Drools 5 there are way less objects
> 92:         19022        1826112  org.drools.reteoo.RightTuple
>
> Has anyone else had any experience of this issue?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Possible-memory-leak-in-Drools-6-0-1-tp4029010.html
> Sent from the Drools: Developer (committer) mailing list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

---

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:

http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Possible-memory-leak-in-Drools-6-0-1-tp4029010p4029018.html

To unsubscribe from Possible memory leak in Drools 6.0.1, click here.
NAML