[image removed] Re: Drools VSM Module - Build Issue Mark Proctor [via Drools - Java Rules Engine] to: petersellars 11/02/2010 05:00 p.m. Last hudson was fiinally blue: https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/ Btw I did reveiw your initial proposal, there where some things I think will need to be addressed. Particularly the idea of the Resource returning multiple resources, it seems a little dirty. I think instead i'd prefer that the Resource returns a changeset that lists those multiple resources. We should probably add a ResourceConfiguration that allows the handler to be provided for handling the resources. Anything that deals with a Resources mapping to multiple Resources needs to fit in with the definition's mapping, which is url based, for the KnowledgeAgent, and will need full test coverage that it doens't break anything in the KnowlegeAgent definitions to url mapping and rebuilding. Mark On 11/02/2010 03:09, Peter Sellars wrote: > Am trying to build drools in order to test a patch for user resources

> have an issue with drools-vsm module. > > I have added a method to the KnowledgeBuilderFactoryService interface.

> clients in the VSM complain that they do not override the method. > > I am sure there is a simple step I am missing that will fix this issue

> appears my snapshot version of the api, core and compiler modules are

> being used by vsm). > > Any ideas? > > Peter Sellars > > > > Attention: > This email may contain information intended for the sole use of > the original recipient. Please respect this when sharing or > disclosing this email's contents with any third party. If you > believe you have received this email in error, please delete it > and notify the sender or [hidden email] as > soon as possible. The content of this email does not necessarily > reflect the views of Solnet Solutions Ltd. > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

View message @ http://n3.nabble.com/Drools-VSM-Module-Build-Issue- tp199452p199482.html To start a new topic under Drools - Dev, email ml-node +62260-488885041(a)n3.nabble.com To unsubscribe from Drools - Dev, click here.

Having it generate a change set pointing to each drl file sounds reasonable.

Another approach is that the tohu tool combines it all into one DRL (but that may be too inconvenient or un-natural for you?). On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:25 AM, petersellars <peter.sellars(a)solnetsolutions.co.nz <mailto:peter.sellars@solnetsolutions.co.nz>> wrote: Mark, Thanks for your feedback and review of the proposed solution and raising of the issues. Much appreciated. The problem I am trying to address is a specific one which I then tried to make generic enough to fit in with the Drools core. My specific issue is that the system I am working with has a custom spreadsheet compiler that generates a number of rule files. I am only interested in regenerating the rule files when the spreadsheet gets changed. I assume it would be best to update the custom spreadsheet compilation to return a changeset once the rule files have been generated - thus allowing me to add them as you propose. I assume I can achieve this with your proposed updates to the solution I have been working on. It is my intention to provide code that not only functions as expected but fits in with the Drools team architecture direction. I shall update in accordance with your proposal if you think this will still fit my solution and provide a generic solution for user resources. Peter Sellars "Mark Proctor [via Drools - Java Rules Engine]" <ml-node +[hidden email] <http://n3.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=202323&i=0... wrote on 11/02/2010 05:00:34 p.m.: > [image removed] > > Re: Drools VSM Module - Build Issue > > Mark Proctor [via Drools - Java Rules Engine] > > to: > > petersellars > > 11/02/2010 05:00 p.m. > > Last hudson was fiinally blue: > https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/ > > Btw I did reveiw your initial proposal, there where some things I think > will need to be addressed. Particularly the idea of the Resource > returning multiple resources, it seems a little dirty. I think instead > i'd prefer that the Resource returns a changeset that lists those > multiple resources. We should probably add a ResourceConfiguration that > allows the handler to be provided for handling the resources. Anything > that deals with a Resources mapping to multiple Resources needs to fit > in with the definition's mapping, which is url based, for the > KnowledgeAgent, and will need full test coverage that it doens't break > anything in the KnowlegeAgent definitions to url mapping and rebuilding. > > Mark > > > On 11/02/2010 03:09, Peter Sellars wrote: > > > Am trying to build drools in order to test a patch for user resources but > > have an issue with drools-vsm module. > > > > I have added a method to the KnowledgeBuilderFactoryService interface. The > > clients in the VSM complain that they do not override the method. > > > > I am sure there is a simple step I am missing that will fix this issue (it > > appears my snapshot version of the api, core and compiler modules are not > > being used by vsm). > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Peter Sellars > > > > > > > > Attention: > > This email may contain information intended for the sole use of > > the original recipient. Please respect this when sharing or > > disclosing this email's contents with any third party. If you > > believe you have received this email in error, please delete it > > and notify the sender or [hidden email] as > > soon as possible. The content of this email does not necessarily > > reflect the views of Solnet Solutions Ltd. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rules-dev mailing list > > [hidden email] > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > View message @ http://n3.nabble.com/Drools-VSM-Module-Build-Issue- > tp199452p199482.html > To start a new topic under Drools - Dev, email ml-node > +[hidden email] <http://n3.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=202323&i=1... > To unsubscribe from Drools - Dev, click here. Attention: This email may contain information intended for the sole use of the original recipient. Please respect this when sharing or disclosing this email's contents with any third party. If you believe you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify the sender or [hidden email] <http://n3.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=202323&i=2... as soon as possible. The content of this email does not necessarily reflect the views of Solnet Solutions Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ View this message in context: Re: Drools VSM Module - Build Issue <http://n3.nabble.com/Drools-VSM-Module-Build-Issue-tp199452p202323.html> Sent from the Drools - Dev mailing list archive <http://n3.nabble.com/Drools-Dev-f62260.html> at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- Michael D Neale home: www.michaelneale.net <http://www.michaelneale.net> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com> _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev