Re: [rules-users] Initial rule delay
On 07/06/2012, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
On 06/06/2012 18:39, Vincent LEGENDRE wrote:
> try with a negative number ?
I would ommit the number all together. I suspect what 0 does is schedule
with intervals of 0s, thus it fires straight away.
timer(int: 5s)
@myself: I really should RFTM before proposing risky (if working) workarounds.
The OP's claim "if the repeat interval is omitted, it uses the
initial delay as the repeat interval" is, untrue; DRL timer's
definition is in line with all similar APIs and definitions, i.e.,
when the repeat interval is omitted, then it's a one shot timer.
@Paul: As I wrote in a previous mail - there's got to be another
effect that causes the repetitions. Note that a live timer is
connected to an *activation*, which isn't the same as being connected
to a *rule*:
1 rule - n activations - n timers - x firings.
-W
Mark
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul R."<reverselogic(a)gmail.com>
> To: "Rules Users List"<rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Mercredi 6 Juin 2012 19:26:22
> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Initial rule delay
>
>
> Thanks Wolfgang, but setting the repeat-interval to 0 seems to have the
> same effect as omitting the repeat-interval [Tested in 5.1& 5.4].
>
>
> Thanks Vincent, this seems to work. However I was hoping for a simpler
> solution :)
>
>
> - Paul
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Vincent LEGENDRE<
> vincent.legendre(a)eurodecision.com> wrote:
>
>
> Yes of course ...
> Simpler this way ...
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wolfgang Laun"< wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com>
> To: "Rules Users List"< rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org>
>
>
> Sent: Mercredi 6 Juin 2012 18:02:40
> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Initial rule delay
>
> Try:
> timer( int:<initial> 0 )
> -W
>
> On 06/06/2012, Paul R.< reverselogic(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm looking for a way to delay a rules initial execution? In the
>> following
>> example, I would like to prevent the rule from firing when the first
>> "Foo"
>> event is inserted into the working memory.
>>
>> rule "DelayTest" when $n : Number() from accumulate( $f : Foo() over
>> window:time(10s) count($f) ) then // bla end
>>
>> The timer attribute seems to almost support what I'm looking for, i.e.
>> it
>> allows for an initial-delay to be specified; but if the repeat interval
>> is
>> omitted, it uses the initial delay as the repeat interval.
>>
>> timer ( int:<initial delay> <repeat interval>? )
>>
>> In my case I would like to block the execution of the rule for an
>> "initial-delay" period, but after that time has elapsed the rule
should
>> fire when every time a new "Foo" event is inserted into the working
>> memory.
>> What is the recommended way to do this?
>>
>> Thanks& Regards,
>>
>> Paul
>>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users