It was just a feeling, but Vincent's words from (presumably) experience gives the individual rulebase option more credence.

On 20 July 2011 09:29, magendo <robert.heisenberg@yahoo.com> wrote:
Thanks for your answers.

The context fact thing would work, but it is really polluting the rules and
makes a lot of unnecessary constraint checks. Furthermore the extends is not
implemented in Drools 4 or I am blind (maybe it would be a good idea to
switch to drools 5 anyway...).

So I think I will go with the one drl per rulebase solution.
@manstis: Could you explain why you think the control fact solution is
better?

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools4-Filter-executed-rules-by-drl-file-tp3182568p3184864.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________