in trunk you can do:
mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, sumCmAndRnr !=
$amt1)
So you'll have to wait till you upgrade to drop the eval.
Mark
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
Here is a question though now, I have the following:
mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, $amt2 :
sumCmAndRnr)
eval($amt1.doubleValue() != $amt2.doubleValue())
Is there a way for me to eliminate the eval given that it makes the
rules engine sub-optimal? I guess one strategy is to create two
separate classes to house the results, but man that seems messy.
On 4/11/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango@gmail.com
>
wrote:
Michael,
I got it working, but using Salience alone.
Thanks!
Ron
On 4/10/07, Ronald R. DiFrango
<
ron.difrango@gmail.com> wrote:
Michael,
OK, here is my attempt to convert the flow chart I have into words:
Step 1: Sum ObjectA
Step 2: Sum ObjectB
Step 3: Sum ObjectC
Step 4: Perform check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do something
if it fails
Step 5: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and
do something if it fails
Step 6: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and
do something if it fails
I literally need it in this order and I was thinking that agenda groups
along with salience could get me there, but I have never used them
before.
Does that help?
Ron
On 4/6/07, Michael Rhoden <
mrhoden@franklinamerican.com> wrote:
Please give a better example or some pseudo code
of what you are trying to do.
-Michael
All,
I have a rules design question for the community. I have 3 lists of
different types of objects that I need to sum if a certain attribute is
present on each one of them. Then after the summing has taken place
execute other rules based upon the results of the summation.
Is there a way that I can accomplish this via salience or agenda groups?
Thanks in advance,
Ron
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users