Hi,

Could you please explain the use of XML and word docs uploaded , some examples ,can I refer these files in the rules which I write in Guvnor .

Hi,

When you upload files to Guvnor XML and .properties files are stored
under XML, properties and everything else for example Word files or PDF
files go to Other assets, documentation.

Toni

Nilima R wrote:
>
> Can you please explain the use of "*XML,properties*" and "*Other
> assets ,documentation*" links available in Guvnor.
>
>
>
> Thanks,


Nilima


From: rules-users-request@lists.jboss.org
To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Date: 02/23/2010 02:11 PM
Subject: rules-users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 62
Sent by: rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org




Send rules-users mailing list submissions to
                rules-users@lists.jboss.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
                https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
                rules-users-request@lists.jboss.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
                rules-users-owner@lists.jboss.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of rules-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Dynamicc Declarative model in Guvnor (Nilima R)
  2. Comparing Date with || OR operator (dhari)
  3. Drools Guvnor (Nilima R)
  4. Re: AGE problem (djb)
  5. Re: Drools Guvnor (Toni Rikkola)
  6. Re: AGE problem (Wolfgang Laun)
  7. Natural Language (Amit Kumar)
  8. Re: AGE problem (Pavel Tavoda)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:11:26 +0530
From: Nilima R <nilima.r@tcs.com>
Subject: [rules-users] Dynamicc Declarative model in Guvnor
To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Message-ID:
                <OFFE53C447.246EB602-ON652576D3.001EE694-652576D3.001F42AA@tcs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi All,


Can we have a dynamic declarative model build in Drools Guvnor.
For example if I have certain tables in database say employee, company,
address ,can we have a drop down for these tables so that end user can
select any one one and  based on that selection model in Guvnor is
created.
At present we specify the names of the model say employee and then add
fields into it. say employee ID etc.



Many Thanks,

Nilima
____________________________________________
=====-----=====-----=====
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
review, distribution, printing or copying of the
information contained in this e-mail message
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error,
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
immediately and permanently delete the message
and any attachments. Thank you


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100223/ffe4d373/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:15:08 -0800 (PST)
From: dhari <sdhari@hotmail.com>
Subject: [rules-users] Comparing Date with || OR operator
To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Message-ID: <1266905708400-347656.post@n3.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"


The following code generates NPE in ReteTuple.java

rule
                when
             Membership ( $regDate : regDate)
             Segment ( startDate < $regDate || startDate > endDate )
       then
                     System.err.print(?Invalid start date?);
end


I am new in Drools and don?t know much about DRL scripting. It works fine I
use && operator instead.
--
View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/Comparing-Date-with-OR-operator-tp347656p347656.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100222/dc6db21e/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:48:19 +0530
From: Nilima R <nilima.r@tcs.com>
Subject: [rules-users] Drools Guvnor
To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Message-ID:
                <OF0A3F231B.87AA84AC-ON652576D3.00226E0A-652576D3.0022A312@tcs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Can you please explain the use of "XML,properties" and "Other assets
,documentation" links available in Guvnor.



Thanks,
Nilima
=====-----=====-----=====
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
review, distribution, printing or copying of the
information contained in this e-mail message
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error,
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
immediately and permanently delete the message
and any attachments. Thank you


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100223/52b2be4e/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:07:55 -0800 (PST)
From: djb <dbrownell83@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] AGE problem
To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Message-ID: <1266908875778-354847.post@n3.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


I think though that the majority of uses for a rules engine is in a business
context, where they don't use astronomical time.  

If the doctor's orders are:
"You cannot get out of bed for 2 months"

This means 59 days if he told you February 1st, and it means 62 days if he
told you July 1st.

So at least for me, I am going to have to work out a plan that involves
GregorianCalendar.  

--
View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/AGE-problem-tp215215p354847.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:07:21 +0200
From: Toni Rikkola <trikkola@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools Guvnor
To: Rules Users List <rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID: <4B837EA9.1070806@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi,

Could you explain the use of XML and word docs uploaded , some examples ,can I refer these files in the rules which i write in Guvnor .



Hi,

When you upload files to Guvnor XML and .properties files are stored
under XML, properties and everything else for example Word files or PDF
files go to Other assets, documentation.

Toni

Nilima R wrote:
>
> Can you please explain the use of "*XML,properties*" and "*Other
> assets ,documentation*" links available in Guvnor.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Nilima
> =====-----=====-----=====
> Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
> message and/or attachments to it may contain
> confidential or privileged information. If you are
> not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
> review, distribution, printing or copying of the
> information contained in this e-mail message
> and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error,
> please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
> immediately and permanently delete the message
> and any attachments. Thank you
>
>
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>  



------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:50:38 +0100
From: Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] AGE problem
To: Rules Users List <rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID:
                <17de7ee81002222350h62ae932an3058353f68204e7f@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 8:07 AM, djb <dbrownell83@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> I think though that the majority of uses for a rules engine is in a
> business
> context, where they don't use astronomical time.
>
> If the doctor's orders are:
> "You cannot get out of bed for 2 months"
>
> This means 59 days if he told you February 1st, and it means 62 days if he
> told you July 1st.
>
>
This is a particularly bad example, because doctors can't say that - at
least not one I'd trust ;-)

I'm arguing that you cannot expect a computer program to relieve you from
the burden of defining what you mean by a "duration of one year" (or month).
Some legal rules require a person to have a certain age, and it is (for
humans)
more convenient to decide this on a person's birthday YMD plus an increment
in the Y number. If  your application requires you to use an increment in
the year
component of the YMDhms representation of a point in time, then you are
indeed stuck with Calendar and the resulting overhead. (Memoizing
the results of YMDhms +/- n years might speed things up, for the usual
price.)

But many applications would be satisfied with using a fixed duration for
a year in terms of 365 or 365.25 or some such value. If, for instance, you
have a  library, and you must decide to move a book into deep storage
"if it has  not been requested for more than a year" you might calculate
this (faster) by adding 356*24*60*60 to the clock value of the last return.

-W

So at least for me, I am going to have to work out a plan that involves
> GregorianCalendar.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n3.nabble.com/AGE-problem-tp215215p354847.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100223/3459eff5/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:21:38 -0800
From: Amit Kumar <amitkumar@gmail.com>
Subject: [rules-users] Natural Language
To: Rules Users List <rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID:
                <33ab2d6e1002230021k249523efsfa8620157b0538f3@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi All,

As you might have understood with my so many questions :) I am looking at
the capabilities of Drools and our team is looking at a comparitive analysis
between Drools and ILOG
One of the feature which is greatly desired is natural language editor. So I
am planning to create my own DSL creator "Poor man's version" which will
introspect the class and generate some DSLs for our need.
An old Blog
http://blog.athico.com/2007/03/standards-based-approach-to-natural.html points
to an interesting article. Does anybody knows where this item is in the
roadmap.

Another suggestion I had was on the Roles and Permissions for the users.
There is a option in drools to permit access for a user to a package and
category. It would be good to add Status to the mix so that the novide user
is prevented from moving rules to production. Small change.. big gain :)

Does anybody has a pointer to a demo of drools showing its capabilities. Or
a comparitive analysis with ILOG.

We are able to show lot of good use for the tool.. but the data model we
have is causing us big headaches in writing easily understandable rules.
The scenario is that we have a "lot" of attributes of a fact. And as part of
model extension lot of attributes are constantly added to the fact.
To make this easier so that we do not have to update the model - we have put
a (key value pair) for the attributes.

So the model structure is

MainFact
  mainAttr1 String
  mainAttr2 String
  List additionalAttrs<AdditionalAttributes> = new
ArrayList<AdditionalAttributes>();

AdditionalAttributes
  attrName String
  attrValue String


So now in guided editor or DSl editor it becomes a nightmare to write a
rule.. and our rule writers will beat us up if we ask them to write a rule
like
aa: AdditionalAttributes (attrName == "var1", val : attrValue)
a: MainFact (mainAttr1 == "mainVal", additionalAttrs contains aa)

Any easy solution for this :)


Thanks,
Amit
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100223/76ede083/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:30:32 +0100
From: Pavel Tavoda <pavel.tavoda@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] AGE problem
To: Rules Users List <rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID:
                <e3e2e4b61002230030n28669a78l72d4dffa68c4b765@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Try to do this in bank application. People come 1 hour after they date
expired and try to charge them for sooner withdrawal because you
calculate with 365.25 not 365 days. You will be kicked, believe me.

Pavel


2010/2/23 Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 8:07 AM, djb <dbrownell83@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think though that the majority of uses for a rules engine is in a
>> business
>> context, where they don't use astronomical time.
>>
>> If the doctor's orders are:
>> "You cannot get out of bed for 2 months"
>>
>> This means 59 days if he told you February 1st, and it means 62 days if he
>> told you July 1st.
>>
>
> This is a particularly bad example, because doctors can't say that - at
> least not one I'd trust ;-)
>
> I'm arguing that you cannot expect a computer program to relieve you from
> the burden of defining what you mean by a "duration of one year" (or month).
> Some legal rules require a person to have a certain age, and it is (for
> humans)
> more convenient to decide this on a person's birthday YMD plus an increment
> in the Y number. If? your application requires you to use an increment in
> the year
> component of the YMDhms representation of a point in time, then you are
> indeed stuck with Calendar and the resulting overhead. (Memoizing
> the results of YMDhms +/- n years might speed things up, for the usual
> price.)
>
> But many applications would be satisfied with using a fixed duration for
> a year in terms of 365 or 365.25 or some such value. If, for instance, you
> have a? library, and you must decide to move a book into deep storage
> "if it has? not been requested for more than a year" you might calculate
> this (faster) by adding 356*24*60*60 to the clock value of the last return.
>
> -W
>
>> So at least for me, I am going to have to work out a plan that involves
>> GregorianCalendar.
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://n3.nabble.com/AGE-problem-tp215215p354847.html
>> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


End of rules-users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 62
*******************************************
 

=====-----=====-----=====
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain 
confidential or privileged information. If you are 
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, 
review, distribution, printing or copying of the 
information contained in this e-mail message 
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If 
you have received this communication in error, 
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and 
immediately and permanently delete the message 
and any attachments. Thank you