Paul,
Don't know whether it's relevant or
not, but we experienced problems when the id of a Drools Flow process (i.e.
the id attribute in the root node of the .rf file) contained a hyphen.
This seemed to screw up the classes auto-generated by Drools. We now mandate
a naming scheme for process ids like Java package names (e.g. "com.company.process"
etc.).
Alan
Tessella plc
26 The Quadrant, Abingdon Science Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, OX14 3YS
E: Alan.Gairey@tessella.com, T: +44 (0)1235 555511, F: +44 (0)1235 553301
www.tessella.com Registered in England No. 1466429
This message is commercial in confidence and
may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to
this message by anyone else is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please inform the sender immediately.
Please note that messages sent or received by the Tessella e-mail system
may be monitored and stored in an information retrieval system.
paulB <paul.borlin@sironahealth.com>
Sent by: rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org
13/08/2010 13:38
|
Please respond to
Rules Users List <rules-users@lists.jboss.org> |
|
|
To
| rules-users@lists.jboss.org
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| Re: [rules-users] Drools Flow inconsistancies |
|
Thanks, salaboy.
Looks like it comes down to the compiled classes like
"mycompany.edi.Process_mycompany_edi_0ReturnValueEvaluator0Invoker".
Anybody know what compiles those or what might throw a wrench into those?
Or does anyone know how I can debug them or view the source?
--
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Flow-inconsistancies-tp1111862p1131582.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users