Hi All,
Can someone tell me how to use create
enums with Dynamic values in Guvnor.
For example I need enum which does not
contain static value like A,B,C rather these A,B,C values come from database.
Nilima
| From:
| rules-users-request@lists.jboss.org
|
| To:
| rules-users@lists.jboss.org
|
| Date:
| 03/12/2010 10:36 PM
|
| Subject:
| rules-users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 55
|
| Sent by:
| rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org |
Send rules-users mailing list submissions to
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
rules-users-request@lists.jboss.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
rules-users-owner@lists.jboss.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of rules-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: OutOfMemoryError on Marshalling with non-existence check
in flow XOR split (heldeen)
2. Re: high sailence event/utility rules and ruleflows (H.C.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:49:03 -0800 (PST)
From: heldeen <heldeen@overstock.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] OutOfMemoryError on Marshalling with
non-existence check in flow XOR split
To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Message-ID: <1268408943169-444246.post@n3.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I think I need to clarify a few things. First the OOME is not in running
the
rules but on marshalling the state for the flow, which I do after each
command using a custom CommandService that marshals the session after each
command is executed. Second, the ValidationRuleFlowGroup is only going
to
insert a ValidationResult() if there is something that is invalid. So a
valid set of facts would have no ValidationResult() in memory, hence wanting
to split to a "valid" branch on "not ValidationResult()".
--
View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/OutOfMemoryError-with-non-existence-check-in-flow-XOR-split-tp443126p444246.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:36:16 -0800 (PST)
From: "H.C." <canterburry@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] high sailence event/utility rules and
ruleflows
To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Message-ID: <1268411776720-444339.post@n3.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Thanks,
I tried this but I don't see my ruleflow group rules coming back and
re-processing once the high priority auto focus rules in my new
"maintenance" agenda group have executed. Do my rules in my ruleflow
group
now also need an agenda group and auto-focus set to be re-evaluated?
--
View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/high-sailence-event-utility-rules-and-ruleflows-tp443327p444339.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
End of rules-users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 55
*******************************************
=====-----=====-----=====
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
review, distribution, printing or copying of the
information contained in this e-mail message
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error,
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
immediately and permanently delete the message
and any attachments. Thank you