> Thanks Greg and Joe.
> I think i should have mentioned this before.
> I can also have other parent rule node in the tree
> structure which tests
> against same fact. Each parent rule node should only
> control its child rule
> nodes, but not other parent rule node and child rule node.
>
> If I do retract, won't it affect other parent rule
> node?
>
>
> Greg Barton wrote:
> >
> > You may consider the other suggestion of retracting
> the fact(s) that would
> > trigger the child rule. It's the more
> "natural" way of going about it.
> >
> > What's driving this design choice?
> >
> > --- On Fri, 10/31/08, techy
> <
techluver007@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> From: techy <
techluver007@gmail.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [rules-users] controling rule
> execution
> >> To:
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> >> Date: Friday, October 31, 2008, 8:24 AM
> >> Thanks Greg.
> >> child rule should be reactivated if parent's
> conditions
> >> for some other fact
> >> are false.
> >> this should happen for each fact. Parent's
> condition
> >> should decide whether
> >> child rule should be executed or not for each
> fact. If
> >> parent's conditions
> >> are true, then don't execute child rule and
> vice versa.
> >>
> >>
> >> Greg Barton wrote:
> >> >
> >> > A combination of higher priority parent rules
> with a
> >> custom agenda filter,
> >> > activated when the parent rule fires, that
> prevents
> >> the child rule from
> >> > firing.
> >> >
> >> > Just a guess.
> >> >
> >> > So, after the child rule is initially
> prevented from
> >> firing, can it be
> >> > reactivated? If so, when and under what
> conditions?
> >> >
> >> > --- On Thu, 10/30/08, techy
> >> <
techluver007@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> From: techy
> <
techluver007@gmail.com>
> >> >> Subject: [rules-users] controling rule
> execution
> >> >> To:
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> >> >> Date: Thursday, October 30, 2008, 11:18
> PM
> >> >> Hello,
> >> >>
> >> >> I would like to have the rules
> parent/child
> >> structure. I
> >> >> don't want the
> >> >> child rules to be executed when
> parent's
> >> conditions
> >> >> are true(i.e
> >> >> consequence is executed) even if
> child's
> >> conditions
> >> >> are true. How Can I
> >> >> achieve that in drools?
> >> >> Please clarify.
> >> >> --
> >> >> View this message in context:
> >> >>
> >>
>
http://www.nabble.com/controling-rule-execution-tp20260028p20260028.html
> >> >> Sent from the drools - user mailing list
> archive
> >> at
> >> >> Nabble.com.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> _______________________________________________
> >> >> rules-users mailing list
> >> >>
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> >> >>
> >>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> _______________________________________________
> >> > rules-users mailing list
> >> >
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> >> >
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
>
http://www.nabble.com/controling-rule-execution-tp20260028p20265921.html
> >> Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive
> at
> >> Nabble.com.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rules-users mailing list
> >>
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> >>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> >
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
>
http://www.nabble.com/controling-rule-execution-tp20260028p20272962.html
> Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
>
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users