Vitor,

Please stop replying to posts with unrelated topics and just changing the title, it messes up the threaded view in most people's email app. See here for more details on netiquette:
http://www.jboss.org/drools/lists.html

Mark
On 14/05/2010 15:51, Makewise - Vitor Rui Mendonça wrote:

Hi Greg!

 

Thanks for your quick answer.

I’m having some trouble with absence of events in Drools (I’ve send some emails on the mailing list regarding that) and I personally think it’s some kind of bug (mine or, probably, drools).

 

So, I’m looking for some help. Instead of explaining all over again, I just point the issue out.

 

Sorry about this mess, too much time around this problem J

 

Thanks, once again!

 

Vítor Mendonça Moreira
Analista / Programador
Direcção de Investigação e Desenvolvimento


Rua Dr. Francisco Sá Carneiro, nº. 4 r/c esq.
2500 - 206 - Caldas da Rainha
Tel: (+351) 262 832 196
Fax: (+351) 262 186 455
Web: www.makewise.pt
Uma empresa: Grupo Sousa Pedro



 

 

From: rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Greg Barton
Sent: sexta-feira, 14 de Maio de 2010 15:31
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Entry-Points can cause NullPointerExceptionand/or no rule firing

 

JIRA issues are for reporting bugs in drools.  Is there a bug you're reporting or do you want help with this particular problem?

--- On Fri, 5/14/10, Makewise - Vitor Rui Mendonça <Vitor.Mendonca@brisa.pt> wrote:


From: Makewise - Vitor Rui Mendonça <Vitor.Mendonca@brisa.pt>
Subject: [rules-users] Entry-Points can cause NullPointerException and/or no rule firing
To: "Rules Users List" <rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
Date: Friday, May 14, 2010, 8:40 AM

Hi again.

 

First of all, I’m running Drools 5.1.0.SNAPSHOT on Windows and Eclipse 3.4.

 

I’ve submitted a Jira Issue (https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-2511):

I've got a system that receives transactions. I want to implement the following rules:
- raise an alarm(alarm event) when there aren't any transaction for an hour (or more);
- if there's an alarm, no more alarms should be raised;
- if there's an alarm and the system receives a transaction, that alarm should be retracted and the system should send an recovery event.

I've implemented the rules this way:
- ***start*** rule to insert an "EngineStart" event when the rules engine starts
- ***notrx_after_start*** rule to detect absence of transactions during the first hour
- ***notrx_after_trx*** rule to detect absence of transactions (during one hour) after last transaction
- ***rearm*** rule to detect transactions and rearm the system.

I made a Maven project with junits, which inserts transactions at specific time, in order to raise the desired events.

Two set of tests were made:
- the rules defined in "default" entry-point: the correspondent junit gives a NullPointerException in DefaultAgenda
- the rules defined in "incoming" entry-point: the correspondent junit doesn't activate the ***rearm*** rule

 

The issue has an attachment with junits and rules to play with.

 

T.I.A.

 

Vítor Mendonça Moreira
Analista / Programador
Direcção de Investigação e Desenvolvimento


Rua Dr. Francisco Sá Carneiro, nº. 4 r/c esq.
2500 - 206 - Caldas da Rainha
Tel: (+351) 262 832 196
Fax: (+351) 262 186 455
Web: www.makewise.pt
Uma empresa: Grupo Sousa Pedro



 


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

 

_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users