Hi Edson,

Slovakia. Beer would be nice ;)

I'll wait for 4.0.4 release. I'm currently using 'eval' (not inline) as a workaround.

Thanks again for your effort.
Michal
 

----- Original Message ----
From: Edson Tirelli <tirelli@post.com>
To: Rules Users List <rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Wednesday, 21 November, 2007 6:36:17 PM
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 'or' with predicate/return val/inline eval with property issue?


   Michal,

   Where are you from? We should pay you a beer for this bug report... :)

   Looked like a simple thing, but it was the most annoying bug I had to deal with in a long time. :(

   Thanks for reporting. It is fixed and will be released in 4.0.4 and 4.1.0.
   If you want, while 4.0.4 is not released, you can build it yourself from here: http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/branches/4.0.x/

    []s
    Edson

2007/11/21, Michal Bali <michalbali@yahoo.ie>:
Hi Edson,

I've created new JIRA issue - JBRULES-1337

Thank you for your time on this.
Regards,
Michal



----- Original Message ----
From: Edson Tirelli < tirelli@post.com>
To: difranr@alumni.pitt.edu; Rules Users List < rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Wednesday, 21 November, 2007 12:48:54 PM
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 'or' with predicate/return val/inline eval with property issue?


    Ronald,

    In my tests, it works if you use a simple constraint. The problem only happens with constraints that use semantic code.
    I tracked down the problem and it is in the LogicTransformer that is used when an "or" CE is present.

    []s
    Edson

2007/11/21, Ronald R. DiFrango < ron.difrango@gmail.com>:
One question do you get different reslts if you do the folowing for the first rule:

Message(  message == "somethingDifferent" ) # this should never match

All I did was eliminate the eval and the explicit call to equals

On Nov 21, 2007 4:05 AM, Michal Bali < michalbali@yahoo.ie> wrote:
Hi,

I have following rule that should never fire, but it does :)

package com.sample
import com.sample.DroolsTest.* ;
rule "ruleThatShouldNeverFire"
       when
               Message(  eval("somethingDifferent".equals(message)) ) # this should never match
               SomeBeanA( ) or SomeBeanB( )
       then
               System.out.println( drools.getRule().getName() + " fired and shouldn't" );
end

stateful ruleSession with following insertions:
           Message message = new Message();
           message.setMessage(  "Hello World" );
           workingMemory.insert( message );
           workingMemory.insert( new SomeBeanA() );
           workingMemory.insert( new SomeBeanB() );

It behaves the same way if we use predicates or retun values:
           #Message(  msg : message -> ("somethingDifferent".equals (msg)) ) # this should never match
           #Message(  message == ("somethingDifferent".equals (message)) ) # this should never match

It looks like the AlphaNode is missing from the Rete network.

Tested with Drools 4.0.3. Java build 1.5.0_11-b03.

Any ideas if this is a bug or am I doing something wrong?

Thanks.
Regards,
Michal

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




--
  Edson Tirelli
  JBoss Drools Core Development
  Office: +55 11 3529-6000
  Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
  JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com


Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




--
  Edson Tirelli
  JBoss Drools Core Development
  Office: +55 11 3529-6000
  Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
  JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com


Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com