I do have get/set methods for each attribute. There are some extra files also which have some other functions.
The same model is working fine in 5.0 and 5.1, its only having issue in the trunk and I wanted to use the trunk code if possible since it has support for collect and accumulate in guided editor...
 
Thanks
Amit

2010/3/18 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti@gmail.com>
I added a comment to your jira entry. Please take a look. 

2010/3/17 Amit Kumar <amitkumar@gmail.com>

Model is also there
 
:)

2010/3/17 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti@gmail.com>

It would be good too if you could provide us your model (or at least a part of it).

Best,


On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Toni Rikkola <trikkola@redhat.com> wrote:
You can create a Jira for this and upload the jar file there.
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/GUVNOR

We will take a look at it and fix it if it is a bug.

Toni

Amit Kumar wrote:
> Sorry for spamming today
> It does seem to be working after I add "Any of the following" or "All
> of the following" and then add the attributes to it. So workaround is
> there..
> But when I add "There is a Equipment" and add a attribute then it
> permits me to assign a variable to it
> like Equipment(eId : entityId)
> but it does not "correctly" give me that variable assigning capability
> in the "Any of " or "All of" blocks .. so struck issue.
> Thanks,
> Amit
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Amit Kumar <amitkumar@gmail.com
> <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Ok I tried again.  :(
>
>     In Equipment I only see manufacturer
>     In EquipmentCA I also only see manufacturer
>     In Software I do not see anything.
>
>     It contains many more classes
>
>     Not sure what I am breaking.. but if you want I can send you my
>     model files to you (in case you want to try). Do not want to post
>     it on alias
>
>     Thanks
>     Amit
>
>
>     2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti@gmail.com
>     <mailto:esteban.aliverti@gmail.com>>
>
>         But, which fields didn't appear in guvnor?
>
>         2010/3/16 Amit Kumar <amitkumar@gmail.com
>         <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>>
>
>             Probably because of OStype and OSversion. Let me fix that
>             and convert to lower case and try. I remember facing this
>             issue sometime back with 5.0
>             Thanks
>             Amit
>
>             On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Amit Kumar
>             <amitkumar@gmail.com <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>                 Its coming from a JAR
>                 Thanks
>                 Amit
>
>                 Equipment
>                       entityId        int
>                       partNumber      String
>                       manufacturer    String
>                       owningEntityId  int
>
>
>
>                 Software
>                       entityId        int
>                       OSType  String
>                       OSVersion       String
>                       imageName       String
>
>
>
>
>
>
>                 EquipmentCA extends Equipment
>                       hostname        String
>                       productName     String
>                       productFamily   String
>                       productId       String
>
>                 2010/3/16 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti@gmail.com
>                 <mailto:esteban.aliverti@gmail.com>>
>
>                     Are you importing your model from a .jar or using
>                     a Declarative Model?
>
>
>                     On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Toni Rikkola
>                     <trikkola@redhat.com <mailto:trikkola@redhat.com>>
>                     wrote:
>
>                         Hi,
>
>                         Its possible that there are some bugs in the
>                         snapshots. Can you tell me
>                         what your model looks like?
>
>                         Toni
>
>                         Amit Kumar wrote:
>                         > The latest builds seem to be no good for guvnor
>                         > They do seem rich in features .. especially
>                         support for
>                         > collect/accumulate in guvnor along with
>                         inbox and global packages.
>                         >
>                         > But But But.. on adding a fact in the
>                         when/then clause then all the
>                         > attributes of the facts are not coming ..
>                         some attributes come.. not
>                         > all of them.
>                         > I am picking it from here
>                         >
>                         https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/target/
>                         > Any other place I can look :)
>                         >
>                         > Thanks
>                         > Amit
>                         >
>                         > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Amit Kumar
>                         <amitkumar@gmail.com <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>
>                         > <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com
>                         <mailto:amitkumar@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>                         >
>                         >     Thanks Jervis!!
>                         >
>                         >     On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:05 PM,
>                         Jervisliu <jliu@redhat.com
>                         <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>
>                         >     <mailto:jliu@redhat.com
>                         <mailto:jliu@redhat.com>>> wrote:
>                         >
>                         >         A new feature called "Sharable
>                         artifacts/Global artifacts" will be
>                         >         available in Drools 5.1. This
>                         feature allows you share an
>                         >         asset among
>                         >         different packages. It also creates
>                         a global area (you can
>                         >         consider it
>                         >         as a global package). Potentially
>                         you can promote an asset
>                         >         that you
>                         >         think is more appropriate to be
>                         defined in a global scope from
>                         >         your
>                         >         current package to the global area,
>                         so that this global asset
>                         >         can be
>                         >         reused by every package. This
>                         feature is already on trunk,
>                         >         maybe you
>                         >         want to give it a try. Any comments
>                         or feedbacks will be highly
>                         >         appreciated.
>                         >
>                         >         Cheers,
>                         >         Jervis
>                         >
>                         >
>                         >         Amit Kumar wrote:
>                         >         > Hello All,
>                         >         >
>                         >         > I am looking to organize the rules
>                         in different categories.
>                         >         But for
>                         >         > distribution purposes We are
>                         creating packages for different
>                         >         > roles/processing phases
>                         >         >
>                         >         > So a rule will reside in one
>                         pckage but for navigation it
>                         >         can belong
>                         >         > to multiple categories
>                         >         >
>                         >         > So packages are like Shirts,
>                         Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
>                         >         > Categories are Color, Material,
>                         Size, Gender and those have sub
>                         >         > categories witin them
>                         >         >
>                         >         > We have rules which will device
>                         the category of the item
>                         >         > Like "red rule", "blue rule",
>                         "cloth rule", leather rule"
>                         >         >
>                         >         > Now the problem we are facing is
>                         for category rules is if I
>                         >         define the
>                         >         > rule in Shirt package .. then I
>                         will not be able ot use it
>                         >         in Pant
>                         >         > package.. Will have to redefine it.
>                         >         >
>                         >         > The other problem in this scenario
>                         is If I have a price rule
>                         >         in Shirt
>                         >         > package and the category is "Blue
>                         Color" and "XL Size" then
>                         >         I will
>                         >         > have to put it in both categories
>                         >         > When I put the "Blue Rule" on
>                         "Blue Category" and "XL Rule"
>                         >         on "XL
>                         >         > Category"  and I put the rule in
>                         both categories.. will it
>                         >         be an "and"
>                         >         > relationship or will be an "OR"
>                         >         >
>                         >         > Regards,
>                         >         > Amit
>                         >         >
>                         >
>                         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                         >         >
>                         >         >
>                         _______________________________________________
>                         >         > rules-users mailing list
>                         >         > rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>                         <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>                         <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>                         <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>>
>                         >         >
>                         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>                         >         >
>                         >
>                         >
>                         _______________________________________________
>                         >         rules-users mailing list
>                         >         rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>                         <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>                         <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>                         <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>>
>                         >
>                         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>                         >
>                         >
>                         >
>                         >
>                         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                         >
>                         > _______________________________________________
>                         > rules-users mailing list
>                         > rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>                         <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>                         >
>                         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>                         >
>
>                         _______________________________________________
>                         rules-users mailing list
>                         rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>                         <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>                         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
>
>                     --
>                     XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
>                     Esteban Aliverti
>
>                     _______________________________________________
>                     rules-users mailing list
>                     rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>                     <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>                     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             rules-users mailing list
>             rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>             <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>             https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
>
>         --
>         XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
>         Esteban Aliverti
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         rules-users mailing list
>         rules-users@lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Esteban Aliverti

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Esteban Aliverti

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users