to be honest I could do with some initial pointers, as I'm struggling with how to acheive this at all. I would have thought to somehow use accumulate, but as far as I can work out there's no way to specify attributes that match across facts, rather than match some constant.

 
On 18 October 2010 15:14, Greg Barton <greg_barton@yahoo.com> wrote:
It would be nice if we had an example of some rules.  That way we can rule out obvious performance killers like cartesian products and multiple "from" clauses in one rule.

GreG

On Oct 18, 2010, at 5:19, Tim 4076 <tm4076@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,
I'm trying to use drools to do grouping of data according to patterns defined in my rules, but I'm having issues creating something that works in a reasonable amount of time (seconds). I've tried all sorts of permutations without much luck and would like to hear how others would do the same thing.

To give an example: I've got a big batch of transaction records and I want to aggregate all the records where the consumer id and product category are the same and the purchases were made within an hour of each other.

The fact that its matching the same values between facts, rather than against constants seems to scupper it somewhat.

I would go down the ETL route, but the idea is for non-techies to define their own aggregations using rules.

-Cheers. Tim


_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users