The guided rule editors really, really, I mean really, do not handle multiple classes with the same simple name in different packages at all well.
Even if you only use a single class in a single rule (I.e. do not attempt to use x.y.z.MyClass and a.b.c.MyClass) the overall DRL being compiled can lead to issues as you're effectively creating:
"import x.y.z.MyClass
rule a
when
MyClass (...)
...
end"
and
"import a.b.c.MyClass
rule b
when
MyClass (...)
...
end"
I suspect issues to arise with class FQCN resolution in at least one of those rules.
If you cannot use different simple names then my advice is to use free-form DRL for these classes; using the FQCN in the rule and exclude the imports (from the "Config" tab).
Sent on the move
I've two classes with same name but in different packages.
I created several guided rules which use these classes when I validate
individual rules they get validated but when I try to Build and Deploy the
project it fails cause it try to find a field in another class.
Unable to create Field Extractor for 'isPH'Field/method 'isPH' not found for
cla
ss 'com.****.****.db.user.TmSlot'
: [Rule name='ProducerHour']
org.drools.core.RuntimeDroolsException: Field/method 'isPH' not found for
class
'com.****.****.db.user.TmSlot'
Unable to Analyse Expression isPH == true:
[Error: unable to resolve method using strict-mode:
com.****.****.db.user.TmSlot.isPH()]
[Near : {... isPH == true ....}]
--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Error-due-to-same-class-name-tp4030304.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users