We don't publicise the internal javadocs, just the public ones. But just checkout the code and look over it, I don't think the internal javadocs will help much.
You lose type discrimination and type safety, but you can already do:Map( this['key'] == "xxx" )
What I think would be more interesting is to use Traits and map a Map to a type safe structure. It would take a some changes, as at the moment the Traits back onto a global triple store, but they could with some changes back onto the provided Map instance. Traits is a form of duck typing.
//code below is illustrative of what is possible, if changes where mad for above idea.
// Create interface
Person
@Trait
String : name
int : age
end
// Identify the Map instance, and wrap it with the Person interface.
rule
$m : Map[ this['name'] != null, this['age'] != null )
then
don( $m : Person.class );
end
// Now the map is identified in a type safe manner.
rule
Person( name == "darth", age == 150 )
then
….
end
Hi All,
I was reading the following thread from august 2009:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/2009-August/010178.html
I would like write a clojure DSL for drools similar to what André was trying to do and I also feel that using maps as fact-objects would be the most idiomatic for Clojure (at least in the general case!).
I am interested by the idea of implementing ObjectType and Accessor interfaces proposed by Edson. It seems that this would be a good fit with Drools and that (if understand correctly!) it would allow the map properties to be properly indexed by the rules engine. However I cannot seem to find these interfaces (ObjectType and *Accessor) in the current API.
Could someone show me where these classes are documented? Or were they moved or replaced? Maybe there is some source code that would make a good example?
Thanks for your help,
Frank
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users