Costello, Robert wrote:

Has anyone else run into issues trying to reference objects in a default package?  I’m trying to use Drools with Grails and my rule which compiled nicely in a package setting has issues when faced with a default package. 

 

The error is “foo” cannot be resolved to a type

 

I’ve tried putting the rule both in the default package and putting it in a named package, and neither seem to work.   If I put my objects back into packages, everything is fine.

 

Any  advice?

I'm not sure the Drools type resolver works with default namespace classes or rules.

 

Thanks,

 

Robert Costello

 

 


_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users