I thought about adding that, but I feel like we would just be reimplementing java, in this case. So, if you need anything else other than simple java beans, you should implement it as a java class.

Regarding the constructor, I might still add a constructor that receives all fields as parameters, just to reduce verbosity when using the java dialect, but if you are using mvel dialect, you can use "with":

rule ...

when ...

then

with( person = new Person() ) {

name = "Bob",

age = 35

}

insert( person );

end

Edson

2010/8/9 Tina Vießmann <tviessmann@stud.hs-bremen.de>

Hi,

is it possible to define a function/constructor inside a fact type
declaration? If yes, how can it be done?

Thank you :)
Tina
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com