Hi,

Is this what you are looking for?

rule "A requires B"
when
$fact1: NodeFact(id == "A", selected == true, $b: b)
$fact2: NodeFact(this == $b, selected == false,  this DESCENDANT-OF $fact1)
then
$fact2.setSelected(true);
end

Best,

2010/5/7 Giovanni Motta <mottagio@gmail.com>
Hi all, i have a question concerning facts hierarchy, i'm looking for some hint as i suppose the same problem could have been faced by someone on the list.

I try to eplain with an example:

- Suppose to have a tree of facts, each object representing an UI widget.
   <root>
    <A id="1">
          <B />
    </A>
    <A id="2">
          <B />
    </A>
  </root>

- The individual elements A(1), B, A(2), B are mapped to facts, that are inserted in a KnowledgeStatefulSession
- A rule exists that states that when an object A is selected, the B object is automatically selected
- An event occurs that causes selection of node A(1)

The expected result is, obviously, that only the B element that is descendant of A(1) must be automatically selected

I'm trying a way to express the 'descendant' relationship in LHS construct.
The rule will look like:

rule "A requires B"
when
$fact1: NodeFact(id == "A", selected == true)
$fact2: NodeFact(id == "B", selected == false,  this DESCENDANT-OF $fact1)
then
$fact2.setSelected(true);
end


What is, in your opinion, the best way to handle this situation? What should replace the fake "DESCENDANT-OF" match?
Do i need to use a function that returns the list of descendant nodes of $fact1 and then match $fact2 against that? 
Will this be fast when dealing with large trees?

Any suggestion will be appreciated, thank you.
Giovanni

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




--
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Esteban Aliverti