That I don't know, sorry! Maybe have a look at the drools JIRA page, see if the issue has been discussed?

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:10 PM, cwolfinger <chase.wolfinger@gmail.com> wrote:

Yes. But the collection I am testing has Integer objects it is the object of
the comparison for containment that is an int primitive.  So my thoughts are
if this would never work unless I use an eval then why does the rules parser
allow the creation of condition that is invalid?
--
View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/Question-on-contains-operator-with-integer-tp440559p442221.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



--
Enda J Diggins