This looks like an MVEL issue, since your expression is being converted into an MVEL predicate. May I ask you please to open a JIRA for that bug?

   Meanwhile, a workaround that shall work for you and may give you improved perf is to split your pattern into 2 patterns using the from keyword:


when

           $dto : DTO( )

           W250_4_1( value in ("0" ,"1" ,"6" ,"7" ,"A" ,"C" ,"D" ,"G" ,"L" ,"M" ,"P" ,"Q" ,"S" ,"V" ,"Z" ) ) from $dto.w250_4_1

then


   Thanks, and hope it helps.

   Edson


2007/8/13, Arsalan S. Zaidi < arsalan.zaidi@capgemini.com>:

Hi.

 

I've currently evaluating Drools 4.0 for a project of ours and I'm running into some problems.

 

I have a rule which looks like this:

 

rule "W250.42 Editable"

      when

            DTO(w250_4_1.value in ("0" ,"1" ,"6" ,"7" ,"A" ,"C" ,"D" ,"G" ,"L" ,"M" ,"P" ,"Q" ,"S" ,"V" ,"Z" ) )

      then

            System.out.println ("0" );

            Action action = createAction("W250.42" , false , true );

            retList.add(action);

end

 

 

both DTO and w250_4_1 are extremely simple beans. w250_4_1 just has 1 property 'value' which is a String and DTO has one property w250_4_1 which is the bean w250_4_1 .

 

Now when I put "0" into w250_4_1 then everything works fine. The rule is true and the 'then' portion is executed. However, if I set w250_4_1 to "6" (which is also present in the in (…)) then I get the following error.

 

org.drools.RuntimeDroolsException : Exception executing predicate org.drools.base.mvel.MVELPredicateExpression@118fa47

      at org.drools.rule.PredicateConstraint.isAllowed(PredicateConstraint.java:197 )

      at org.drools.reteoo.AlphaNode.assertObject(AlphaNode.java:122 )

      at org.drools.reteoo.CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.propagateAssertObject(CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.java:317 )

      at org.drools.reteoo.ObjectTypeNode.assertObject(ObjectTypeNode.java:168 )

      at org.drools.reteoo.Rete.assertObject(Rete.java:168 )

      at org.drools.reteoo.ReteooRuleBase.assertObject( ReteooRuleBase.java:190)

      at org.drools.reteoo.ReteooWorkingMemory.doInsert(ReteooWorkingMemory.java:70 )

      at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:848 )

      at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:822 )

      at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:623 )

      at com.sample.DroolsTest.main( DroolsTest.java:34)

Caused by: org.mvel.PropertyAccessException: failed to access property: <<==>> in: class com.sample.DTOShadowProxy

      at org.mvel.optimizers.impl.refl.ReflectiveAccessorOptimizer.compileGetChain(ReflectiveAccessorOptimizer.java:137 )

      at org.mvel.optimizers.impl.refl.ReflectiveAccessorOptimizer.optimizeAccessor(ReflectiveAccessorOptimizer.java:96 )

      at org.mvel.ASTNode.getReducedValueAccelerated(ASTNode.java:194 )

      at org.mvel.ast.Or.getReducedValueAccelerated(Or.java:18 )

      at org.mvel.MVELRuntime.execute( MVELRuntime.java:87)

      at org.mvel.CompiledExpression.getValue( CompiledExpression.java:98)

      at org.mvel.MVEL.executeExpression( MVEL.java:202)

      at org.drools.base.mvel.MVELPredicateExpression.evaluate(MVELPredicateExpression.java:36 )

      at org.drools.rule.PredicateConstraint.isAllowed(PredicateConstraint.java:191 )

      ... 10 more

Caused by: org.mvel.PropertyAccessException: could not access property ('=')

      at org.mvel.optimizers.impl.refl.ReflectiveAccessorOptimizer.getBeanProperty(ReflectiveAccessorOptimizer.java:252 )

      at org.mvel.optimizers.impl.refl.ReflectiveAccessorOptimizer.compileGetChain(ReflectiveAccessorOptimizer.java:106 )

      ... 18 more

 

If I keep w250_4_1 as "0", but move "0" in the rule to any other place place in the in() list (e.g. in ("1","0",…), then I get a similar error.

 

I get similar errors when trying to use 'not in' in the same circumstance, except that then the property is ('!')

 

What seems to be the issue?

 

Thanks in advance!

 

Regards,

 

--Arsalan

This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.


_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




--
  Edson Tirelli
  Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
  Office: +55 11 3529-6000
  Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
  JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com