Hi,
I’m trying to figure out an issue for
three days now and I’m getting kind of desperate, so I hope someone can
help.
I’m using Drools in combination with
an EMF model which is modeling a computer network. On init, I read the whole
structure of the model and insert all elements into the working memory. Some of
the entities share the super class “Device” which has an attribute “state”.
Now I’m having the following rule to
change an attribute of one of the model entities:
rule "Set
received status to model"
when
$event
: SomeEvent (
$hostname
: hostname,
$hoststate
: hoststate,
$timestamp
: timestamp
)
$device
: Device (
name
== $hostname
)
then
modify($device)
{
setState($hoststate);
}
db.commit(false);
retract($event);
System.err.println("Set
status of " + $device + " to " +
$hoststate);
end
… which works perfectly fine. Anyway,
what I want to do in this test case is to react whenever all child devices
of a mutual parent device (e.g. hosts on one switch) are no longer reachable.
I thought of a rule like the following:
rule "Parent
Children Test"
when
$parent
: Device (
$children
: eContents,
eContents.size
> 0
)
forall (
$child
: Device (
state ==
"DOWN"
)
from $children
)
then
…
end
… which by the way worked perfectly fine as long as I was not
using objects from a model. My first idea was that for some strange reason the
object might get copied so that I actually would have two different references
after modifying it, but this is not the case. When I initialize the rule base
with the circumstances that the second rule would fire, it really does. It just
seems as it would not being evaluated after changing the attribute, but this is
not the case either! So all I can think of is some strange caching, maybe in
combination with the forall statement?
Maybe someone has some experience when using Drools with EMF + CDO and
experienced as similar issue?
Any help would be very very very much appreciated!
Thanks
in advance
Georg