2007/9/13, Christopher.Mathrusse@sybase.com <
Christopher.Mathrusse@sybase.com>:
I did make certain that my rule file
had the extension of .dslr. I discovered this early on and realized the
importance when I renamed it. Of course I renamed it back to .dslr once
I saw the difference.
The DRL preview of my rule is
as follows:
rule
"Maximum Order
Amount Exceeded"
salience
9800
when
theOrder : Order( amount >= 100000 )
then
theOrder.setManualRelease(drools.getRule().getName());retract(theOrder);
end
Thanks once again for all the help...
No, you need to identify which object are you trying to retract,
since you may have multiple facts constrained in the LHS.
Regarding your problem, make sure your rules file has the
extension ".dslr" so that eclipse selects the correct editor
when opening the file. Then click in the DRL preview in the editor bottom
tab. Can you please show me the result of the DRL preview?
Thanks
Edson
2007/9/12, Christopher.Mathrusse@sybase.com
<
Christopher.Mathrusse@sybase.com>:
I was just looking for a more "short hand" syntax, one where
I would not need to declare "theOrder".
On the same subject though, I compiled my rules with the DRL/DSL editors
in Eclipse (very nice by the way) and I am getting a compilation error
being caused by my DSL entry:
[consequence][]Manually release the Order=setManualRelease(drools.getRule().getName());retract(theOrder);
It seems that there is an issue with the retract(theOrder);statement.
The method retract(Order) is undefined for the type Rule_Maximum_Order_Amount_Exceeded_0
Might you have any idea as to why this would be occurring or exactly what
the message is meaning?
Thanks for the help...
Yes, that is correct.
Why do you mean by a "cleaner" way?
[]s
Edson
2007/9/12, Christopher.Mathrusse@sybase.com
<Christopher.Mathrusse@sybase.com
>:
I'm using a DSL with my DRL file and I've read through the documentation
but I've gotten hung-up on the syntax. Below is a rule from my DRL and
the expansion in my DSL.
My rule in the DRL:
rule "Maximum
Order Amount Exceeded"
salience 9800
when
There is
an Order with
- an amount
that exceeds 100000
then
Manually release the
Order
end
My DSL:
[condition][]There is an Order with=Order()
[condition][]- an amount that exceeds {number}=amount >= {number}
[consequence][]Manually release the Order=setManualRelease(drools.getRule().getName());
What I would like to do is add to my consequence the following in red:
[consequence][]Manually release the Order=setManualRelease(drools.getRule().getName());retract(theOrder);
I know that I would need to modify my condition statement to be able to
use the variable theOrder in my call to retract:
[condition][]There is an Order with=theOrder
: Order()
but is there a cleaner way to achieve this?
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users