that might be an undersell. We do full derivation tree's, as per prolog. But we take this a step further, and have fully reactive derivation trees - which most prolog systems does not have.Some backward chaining functionality is indeed available, although it cannot be compared with what you have in, say, Prolog.It's "Rete", not "Reto". Being Rete-based is reportedly disappearing with 6.x.I'm not sure what sort of criterion the "graphical representation" of rules should represent. There is a way for displaying the Rete network resulting from a rule, but it's not something over which a user like a "business analyst" would get all excited.
-W_______________________________________________On 8 July 2013 08:33, Fatma Zaheer <fmaqsoom@yahoo.com> wrote:
Dear Rules users,Can anyone of you verify the information in the table mentioned below on JBoss Drools ( business rules management systems)?Thanks in advance,
Evaluation Criteria
JBoss Drools
Software Platform
Java
Facilitate for rules testing
Yes
Level of language of rules
High
Type of target organization
All
Coding of rules required
Yes
Business analysts control business logic
Yes
Rules based web application
Yes
On Cloud
n.a.
Forward/Backward chaining
Forward chaining
Uses Reto-base or constraint base rules engine
Reto-Base
Graphical representation of rules
Yes
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users