Giving those other rules a higher salience is one way, but I think
it is better to add a boolean field "usedForAAA" to class EventA.

rule "three A"
when
  $a1: EventA( $index : index, usedForAAA == false )
  $a2: EventA( index == $index, usedForAAA == false )
  $a3: EventA( index == $index, usedForAAA == false )
  not EventB( this after[0ms] $a1 && before[0ms] $a3, index == $index )
then
  // ... match
  modify( $a1 ){ setUsedForAAA( true ) }
  modify( $a2 ){ setUsedForAAA( true ) }
  modify( $a3 ){ setUsedForAAA( true ) }
end

-W


2010/10/25 ΥΤΩ©Ω© <kevin223@gmail.com>
Thanks Wolfgang,

It now starts to make sense to me. However, is it possible that I don't retract those matched eventA? All those events might be used to evaluate against other rules.

Thanks again,
Kevin Zhao

2010/10/25 Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@gmail.com>
I assume you are using Fusion, using a session clock so that temporal operators are available.

rule "three A"
when
  $a1: EventA( $index : index )
  $a2: EventA( index == $index )
  $a3: EventA( index == $index )
  not EventB( this after[0ms] $a1 && before[0ms] $a3, index == $index )
then
  // ... match
  retract( $a1 );
  retract( $a2 );
  retract( $a3 );
end

-W

2010/10/25 ΥΤΩ©Ω© <kevin223@gmail.com>
Hello,

I'm still quite new to the drools stuffs just getting the examples running. I'm sorry if my question is too basic.
I have a system that will continuously to receive events sent from some other system. Basically I have two types of events, eventA and eventB. 
Both eventA and eventB have two properties, index and timestamp.

What I want is to capture a pattern to meet the following conditions

1. every 3 consecutive eventsA without any eventB in between having a same index value ordering by their timestamp. 

2. all events in a matched pattern will have the same value of property index.

3. if a pattern is matched, any of the events in this pattern should not be used again for a new matching.

there are some examples below, the number after a colon stands for the value of its index number and assume those events are already ordered by their timestamp.

eventB:2    eventA:1     eventA:1     eventA:1  eventB:3      --------- one successful match, we have three eventA with same index value 1 in a row

eventB:2    eventA:1     eventA:1     eventB:1  eventA:1      --------- no match because there's an eventB in between

eventB:2    eventA:1     eventA:1     eventB:2  eventA:1      --------- one successful match because the in-between eventB has a different index value

eventA:1    eventA:1     eventA:1     eventA:1  eventA:1      --------- only one match, because once matched, the events can not be used for a second match again.


I just don't know how to write a rule like this. Is there anyone who can shed some lights on?

Best Regards,
Kevin



_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users