Mario,
I am glad the case we provided helped improving Drools.
We'll try to get our hands on your commit in the next days to confirm that everything's fine.
And let me add that it's been a pleasure to get such a prompt feedback from you guys,
I am longing to raise the next issue ;)
Thanks again,
Vieri


On 1 April 2014 16:22, Mario Fusco <mario.fusco@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi again,

I reviewed all our events related code and I just pushed a commit (
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/commit/f415b17cff696136fa83eb9e7837629f5542b24f
) that should fix all the issues you reported. The test cases you provided
have been really precious by the way. Thanks a lot for them.

Also note that, since I fixed the way our timed rules are scheduled, just
using a timer in the rule doing the accumulate as you did in your first
email now works as you expected. I tested it with both cron and interval
timers.

Thanks again for your help,
Mario



--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Drools-Fusion-inconsistencies-at-increasing-event-throughputs-tp4028947p4029070.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



--
Vieri Emiliani
vieri.emiliani@gmail.com