Exactly what I was thinking about, but I wanted to check first if I could reuse drools' bytecode generation instead of adding another thirdparty to the mix (one of my previous questions actually). I do want to avoid messing with custom classloaders as much as I can :-)
From what I've seen, it doesn't seem to be easily reusable though

Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:33:43 +0200
From: vincent.legendre@eurodecision.com
To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Guvnor Declarative Model

Ok, not simple indeed ...
And why can't you generate a POJO instead of declarative fact ?

De: "Jean-Paul Shemali" <jshemali@hotmail.com>
À: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Envoyé: Lundi 10 Septembre 2012 10:06:43
Objet: Re: [rules-users] Guvnor Declarative Model

Simply by not writing them in drools, but in another (proprietary) language, which in turn gets translated to drools at runtime.
Of course there's nothing really simple about the translation and how the actual facts get generated

Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 23:53:47 +0200
From: vincent.legendre@eurodecision.com
To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Guvnor Declarative Model

How can you declare your facts (or rules) if you don't know beforehand the structure of the POJO to use ?

_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users