Natraj,

   Globals were not designed to be available in functions, unless they are sent in as parameters in the way you did in your second example.

   []s
   Edson

2007/7/2, Natraj Gudla <natraj.gudla@gmail.com>:
Hello,
 
I am using Drools 3.0.6. While using a global variable in a function, the compiler complains it cannot resolve the global variable name. Something like below
 

global

com.sample.ExampleLogger customLogger;

function

void logMessage(String msg){

customLogger.logMessage("Log Message from the function");

}

In the above code, it complains "customLogger cannot be resolved". I am able to refer the global in the consequence of a rule directly. What is the problem using the reference within a function.
 
On the other hand, i am able to do something like
 

function void logMessage(ExampleLogger custLogger,String msg){

custLogger.logMessage(msg+

" Accept gloabal as function parameter");

}
and call from the consequence of a rule : logMessage(customLogger);  // I am passing the global to the function as an argument and then use it to log a message.
This way is working. But not the first way of using the global in the function.
 
Any help??

Thanks
--
Natraj Gudla


_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




--
  Edson Tirelli
  Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
  Office: +55 11 3529-6000
  Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
  JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com