On 5/4/10, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@gmail.com> wrote:

Actually, this kind of error isn't discovered by the Drools DRL compiler; it would be flagged by the Java compiler. (You can verify: if you make the same error in Java code, you'll get that error message.)

But if you are using dialect "mvel" (are you?), this is not flagged as an error, and it would silently convert the Double to a String, and set fid31003 to "497.0". Is this what keeps your other rules from firing, i.e., the excess ".0"?

I suggest that you do not use "mvel" unless there is a compelling reason (in other rules). Even then, you might restrict use "mvel" to those rules where it is really necessary.

-W

2010/5/4 Puneet duggal <duggalpunit@gmail.com>

drlFile = BusinessRuleUtils.createCombinedDrlDocument(id,map.get(id));

     PackageBuilder PACKAGE_BUILDER = new PackageBuilder(BUILDER_CONFIGURATION);
     org.drools.rule.Package pkg = null;
     PACKAGE_BUILDER
       .addPackageFromDrl(new StringReader(drlFile));
     if (PACKAGE_BUILDER.hasErrors()) {
      DSM_LOGGER
        .logFatal("Error has occured while building package. For Parameter ID : "
          + id
          + " Error details are : "
          + PACKAGE_BUILDER.getErrors()
            .toString());
     } else {
      pkg = PACKAGE_BUILDER.getPackage();
      RULEBASE.addPackage(pkg);
      DSM_LOGGER
        .logInfo("Package created for Component Prmr ID : "
          + id);
     }

This is the code which i am using at it is not giving

any error at the time creating the drl file.it is also

not giving any error at the time of calling of execute()

method , but rules are not executed .

On 5/4/10, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@gmail.com> wrote:
Anatoly,

please note that I wrote "please" to Puneet, which is usually not considered
as being "impolite". Also, kindly note that I asked for more information, which,
in my book, is not "inconsiderate", as simply deleting Puneet's post might have been.

I do resent being called a "hater", and I'll let the community judge whether
my (admittedly ironic) kidding is "hateful". Somehow, however, posters have to
be admonished to state their problem more detailed, without people on the
list having to waste their time playing guessing games or writing replies begging
for more information.

-W

PS: A you can see now, it was not a question of "debugging", and so you have wasted
your time on a "simple question". :-)

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:10 AM, tolitius <webakaunt@gmail.com> wrote:

@Wolfgang,

No need to be a hater Wolfgang, the question is simple. I agree,
examples would be helpful, but that is NOT how you grow a friendly
community.

Community is the biggest problem JBoss has. Why is it so inhumanly
difficult to be polite and considerate?

/Anatoly

--
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Rules-doubt-tp774023p775029.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users