If you archive a rule or package to delete it in the BRMS then you cannot create a new rule or package with the same name as the archived assets - you get an error saying the rule or package already exists! Is this the expected behaviour, or a bug? I have asked this question before (more than 3 days ago, honest:), but got no reply, so apologies to anyone who has read this question earlier.

 

The workaround I'm using at the moment is to rename a package or rule before archiving it. This seems to allow you to create a new rule/package with the same name as the original rule/package - but it isn't nice or intuitive. 

 

Thanks

Shahad