On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:51 AM, nickS
<nsanders@msxi-euro.com> wrote:
Hi
I've been learning drools ands I saw that there is a Fibonacci example, so I
thought I'd write my own using mvel as the dialect and then compare it to
the model solution.
However, I couldn't get mine working. It parsed but the behaviour was very
odd. It kept ignoring the modify block in my recurse rule and consequently
it went into an infinite loop. I compared it to the 'approved' solution and
the two were pretty much the same, except that it worked and mine didn't.
After a lot of checking I noticed that I had started my curly brace on a new
line after modify but the example had continued straight after the closing
brace of the modify.
Works //
modify ( f ){
value = 1
};
or
modify ( f ){value = 1 };
Doesn't Work //
modify ( f )
{
value = 1
};
Does anyone know if this is a bug or a feature?
--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/MVEL-curly-braces-position-bug-or-feature-tp3638341p3638341.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users