OK. I am using the following environment items:
Eclipse: 3.3.2.
Plugins/Features from the link you provided below.
Drools runtime 5.0.1
I still see the same error in Eclipse, however, I am able to compile the code using through my application using the ResourceFactory.newClassPathResource call and adding it to my KnowledgeBuilder. So, the problem is definitely with the Eclipse Drools plugin. Could Eclipse 3.3.2 be the problem? I will upgrade and test when I have time, but maybe someone else can confirm.
Thanks.
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/target/
Eclipse 3.5.2.
Drools runtime 5.0.1.
Edson2010/3/5 Moe Alkhafaji <moe.alkhafaji@medcpu.com>
Edson,
Just to make sure, can you please send me the link of where you downloaded your Eclipse plugin from? Also, what version of Eclipse are you using? Thanks.2010/3/5 Edson Tirelli <ed.tirelli@gmail.com>
:) I do believe you are seeing this errors, but I have no idea why. I just created a new drools project in my eclipse environment, set the target runtime to Drools 5.0.1, and copy and pasted your rules bellow. I executed a the rules and I got the correct results:
--------------------
Rule Definitions TermContractions 1.1 Executed
I have no error in my eclipse either, so I guess you have some other problem (maybe in your environment) going on there...
Edson
2010/3/5 Moe Alkhafaji <moe.alkhafaji@medcpu.com>Thanks Edson. I wish I can send a screen shot, but I just had a bunch of white lines in the file on top of this. I removed all the bad lines, and simplified the rule to isolate any potential problem outside of this. Here is the simplified version (entire content of the rule file):
#created on: Jun 23, 2009
package com.medcpu.eephratobmaineval(1 == 1)
rule "Definitions TermContractions 1.1"
when
then
System.out.println("Rule Definitions TermContractions 1.1 Executed");eval(2 == 3)
end
rule "TermContractions 2.8" extends "Definitions TermContractions 1.1" <=== Line 11
when
then
System.out.println("Rule TermContractions 2.8 Executed");
end
And here are the errors again:
nds.when cannot be resolved to a type MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl line 11Syntax error on token ""Definitions TermContractions 1.1"", . expected MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl line 11Syntax error, insert ";" to complete BlockStatements MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl line 11
Syntax error on token "then", invalid AssignmentOperator MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl line 11
The left-hand side of an assignment must be a variable MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl line 11
unknown:11:28 mismatched token: [@42,260:266='extends',<7>,11:28]; expecting type THEN MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl
2010/3/5 Edson Tirelli <ed.tirelli@gmail.com>
These error messages don't make much sense to me, but it is accusing error on line 19 now... considering that I removed lines and the error before was on line 11, isn't this another problems in rules down in the file?
Edson2010/3/5 Moe Alkhafaji <moe.alkhafaji@medcpu.com>Thanks Edson,
I tried using the rules you pasted below, and here are the errors again (same line)
nds.when cannot be resolved to a type MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl line 19
Syntax error on token ""Definitions TermContractions 1.1"", . expected MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl line 19
Syntax error on token "then", invalid AssignmentOperator MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl line 19
Syntax error, insert ";" to complete BlockStatements MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl line 19
The left-hand side of an assignment must be a variable MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl line 19
unknown:19:28 mismatched token: [@134,611:617='extends',<7>,19:28]; expecting type THEN MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl
I also understand about what you saying regarding additional things I have to do to ensure that only the child rule executes, but I want to go through the first step first :) Thanks!
2010/3/5 Edson Tirelli <ed.tirelli@gmail.com>
Hmmm, you should be receiving a duplicate variable declaration error... would you please open a JIRA for us to double check what is happening and fix the error message?
Meanwhile, try without repeating the constraints on the parent rule in the child rule:when
rule "Definitions TermContractions 1.1"
when
mpr : MPUFacade()
eval(!mpr.isImportant(Constants.FINDING_KEYWORD_Contractions_Frequency))
then
mpr.print("Rule Definitions TermContractions 1.1 Executed");
end
rule "TermContractions 2.8" extends "Definitions TermContractions 1.1"
Also, remember that unless you use some of the tricks I mentioned before, both rules will fire.
eval(!mpr.isImportant(Constants.FINDING_KEYWORD_TEST))
then
mpr.print("Rule TermContractions 2.8 Executed");
end
[]s
Edson2010/3/5 Moe Alkhafaji <moe.alkhafaji@medcpu.com>Here are the rules that I created (sorry for breaking that in multiple emails), I hope this is all the information needed:
rule "Definitions TermContractions 1.1"
when
mpr : MPUFacade()
eval(!mpr.isImportant(Constants.FINDING_KEYWORD_Contractions_Frequency))
then
mpr.print("Rule Definitions TermContractions 1.1 Executed");
end
rule "TermContractions 2.8" extends "Definitions TermContractions 1.1" <=== Line 11
when
mpr : MPUFacade()
eval(!mpr.isImportant(Constants.FINDING_KEYWORD_Contractions_Frequency))
eval(!mpr.isImportant(Constants.FINDING_KEYWORD_TEST))
then
mpr.print("Rule TermContractions 2.8 Executed");
endOn Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Moe Alkhafaji <moe.alkhafaji@medcpu.com> wrote:
Specifically speaking, here is what I get on Eclipse when I do that:
nds.when cannot be resolved to a type MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl line 11
Syntax error on token ":", ; expected MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl line 11
Syntax error on token ""Definitions TermContractions 1.1"", . expected MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl line 11
Syntax error on token "then", invalid AssignmentOperator MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl line 11
Syntax error, insert ";" to complete Statement MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl line 11
Syntax error, insert ";" to complete Statement MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl line 11
Syntax error, insert ";" to complete Statement MPU/src/rules EEphratOBMain.drl line 11
Line 11 is:
rule "TermContractions 2.8" extends "Definitions TermContractions 1.1"
and "Definitions TermContractions 1.1" is another rule defined in the same drl.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Moe Alkhafaji <moe.alkhafaji@medcpu.com> wrote:Thanks Edson, I will try that. However, I have one follow up question. I tried to use the "extends" command and it did not work (it gave me a syntax error). I am using the latest Drools 5.0 M1. Could it be because the Eclipse Drools plugin does not support this feature yet and if I ignore this error on Eclipse it would still work at runtime?
Thanks!2010/3/5 Edson Tirelli <ed.tirelli@gmail.com>
Although I noticed the other day that this is not documented yet, Drools 5.0.x does support rule inheritance. In your case, it would be written as:
rule r1
when
A()
then
// do something
end
rule r2 extends r1
when
B()
then
// do something else
end
When using inheritance, the subrule will inherit the whole LHS of the parent rule.
Integration test here:
http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/labs/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-compiler/src/test/resources/org/drools/integrationtests/extend_rule_test.drl
http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/labs/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-compiler/src/test/resources/org/drools/integrationtests/test_RuleExtend.drl
In your case, you have an extra requirement that if a child rule fires, you don't want the parent rule to fire. My suggestion is either doing this with a logical condition, or adding drools.halt() on the consequence of rules that should stop subsequent firings, or using activation-groups + salience. Example, in the above case, you could have:
rule r1
activation-group "example rules"
salience 10
when
A()
then
// do something
end
rule r2 extends r1
activation-group "example rules"
salience 20
when
B()
then
// do something else
end
Since rule 2 has a higher salience, if it activates it will fire first, and due to the activation-group, it will cancel the activation of r1 preventing it to fire.
Hope it helps.
Edson2010/3/5 malkhafaji <moe.alkhafaji@medcpu.com>
Hello,
I know, from searching this forum and posting before, that the concept of
inheritance does not exist today in Drools. However, I have a need for it.
Here is my specific situation:
I have certain rules that have some generic conditions to be fired:
Rule 1
If A Then X end
Rule 2
If A, B Then Y end
What I would like to do is, if Rule 2 is true, then I don't want Rule 1 to
execute. I have many and many of those rules, so combining all the
conditions in less number of rules violates our design having rules being
mutually exclusive. That is why I wanted to include this behavior as a
natural inheritance behavior rather than forcing the flow with logic inside
the rule itself (you will make rules aware of others this way).
So, since there is not built-in feature that allows you to do that, do
people suggest anything that I can do without having to mix Rule 1 and Rule
2 into one rule with complex conditional statements? Any ideas?
The only thing I can think of is taking this logic processing outside of
drools, which is something that I am not too excited about.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/Inheritance-Like-Design-Question-tp430848p430848.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Moe Alkhafaji
Chief Technology Officer, MedCPU
Phone: (630) 290-1113
Email: cto@medcpu.com
This message contains information which may be confidential. Unless you are the addressee, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in this message. If you have received this email in error, please notify cto@medcpu.com and please delete the message immediately. In order for the contents of this message to be binding on behalf of MedCPU it must be confirmed in writing by an authorized signatory of MedCPU. Our company accepts no liability for the content of this email unless it is so confirmed. The views or opinions presented herein do not necessarily represent those of the company.
--
Moe Alkhafaji
Chief Technology Officer, MedCPU
Phone: (630) 290-1113
Email: cto@medcpu.com
This message contains information which may be confidential. Unless you are the addressee, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in this message. If you have received this email in error, please notify cto@medcpu.com and please delete the message immediately. In order for the contents of this message to be binding on behalf of MedCPU it must be confirmed in writing by an authorized signatory of MedCPU. Our company accepts no liability for the content of this email unless it is so confirmed. The views or opinions presented herein do not necessarily represent those of the company.
--
Moe Alkhafaji
Chief Technology Officer, MedCPU
Phone: (630) 290-1113
Email: cto@medcpu.com
This message contains information which may be confidential. Unless you are the addressee, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in this message. If you have received this email in error, please notify cto@medcpu.com and please delete the message immediately. In order for the contents of this message to be binding on behalf of MedCPU it must be confirmed in writing by an authorized signatory of MedCPU. Our company accepts no liability for the content of this email unless it is so confirmed. The views or opinions presented herein do not necessarily represent those of the company.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Moe Alkhafaji
Chief Technology Officer, MedCPU
Phone: (630) 290-1113
Email: cto@medcpu.com
This message contains information which may be confidential. Unless you are the addressee, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in this message. If you have received this email in error, please notify cto@medcpu.com and please delete the message immediately. In order for the contents of this message to be binding on behalf of MedCPU it must be confirmed in writing by an authorized signatory of MedCPU. Our company accepts no liability for the content of this email unless it is so confirmed. The views or opinions presented herein do not necessarily represent those of the company.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Moe Alkhafaji
Chief Technology Officer, MedCPU
Phone: (630) 290-1113
Email: cto@medcpu.com
This message contains information which may be confidential. Unless you are the addressee, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in this message. If you have received this email in error, please notify cto@medcpu.com and please delete the message immediately. In order for the contents of this message to be binding on behalf of MedCPU it must be confirmed in writing by an authorized signatory of MedCPU. Our company accepts no liability for the content of this email unless it is so confirmed. The views or opinions presented herein do not necessarily represent those of the company.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Moe Alkhafaji
Chief Technology Officer, MedCPU
Phone: (630) 290-1113
Email: cto@medcpu.com
This message contains information which may be confidential. Unless you are the addressee, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in this message. If you have received this email in error, please notify cto@medcpu.com and please delete the message immediately. In order for the contents of this message to be binding on behalf of MedCPU it must be confirmed in writing by an authorized signatory of MedCPU. Our company accepts no liability for the content of this email unless it is so confirmed. The views or opinions presented herein do not necessarily represent those of the company.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users