It should work without creating a dummy constraint,
try this:

CONDITION

<leave this row blank>

$serviceContract:CreditServiceContract()

Cheers,

  Jarek

Hehl, Thomas wrote:

> Nope, that’s how it works. I wrote it up as a defect and it got closed

> because no one seemed to think it was an issue. So, since I don’t
have 

> the time available to be a contributor, I decided not to complain.

> 

>  

> 

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> 

> *From:* rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org 

> [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of 

> *kfs2@chryslerfinancial.com

> *Sent:* Thursday, May 21, 2009 9:05 AM

> *To:* Rules Users List

> *Subject:* [rules-users] variable binding without condition in Decision

> table

> 

>  

> 

> 

> I have a decision table where I need to bind a variable to use in
the 

> action.  The problem is that the binding does not happen unless
I apply 

> a condition.  What I want in the resulting rule is this:

> 

> $serviceContract: CreditServiceContract ( )

> 

> This is what I want but does not work.  The binding does not
happen so 

> the rule does not compile.

> 

> This works but I hate to add an arbitrary condition just to accomplish
a 

> binding.

> 

> 

> 

> I'm sure I am just missing something.  Can someone point that
out?

> 

> Thanks

> 

> 

> 

> Kent Symanzik

> 

> 

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> 

> _______________________________________________

> rules-users mailing list

> rules-users@lists.jboss.org

> 
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________

rules-users mailing list

rules-users@lists.jboss.org

https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users