Hi Edson,
thanks for the quick reply...
Edson Tirelli wrote:
> It depends if you are talking about Drools 4 or 5. You are right
> about Drools 4. Drools 5 has "quasi-pluggable" operators... hehehe :)
Sorry, didn't mention it. I was talking about the 4.0.x series. This
leads to the following.
> For more info, look at the EvaluatorDefinition interface in Drools 5
> and its several implementations for examples.
Well, how stable and usable (eclipse integration?) is drools 5? (I am
using the drools rule engine mostly; not the BRMS)
While I may not need top notch stability and can cope with some changes
to the codebase over time ( research project ), Drools only is one part
of a pretty complicated application. So far, this was the major reason
for not having a closer look in the new version.
> BTW, most important thing that I forgot to mention: we obviously are
> interested in feedback and contributions on the feature, from simple
> ideas and suggestions to actual patches and improvements!
Well, we agree here. The previous two posts were ment to start some
discussion. Now - as I need this feature rather sooner than later - I am
looking into the implementation. JIRA ticket with more will follow if I
am sucessfull.
cu, Michael