Relax, Vincent, it was sent due to my explicit request, and it was a maller size version.

I've taken this off-list to get a first-hand impression of why these DTs are considered as a viable solution, and how it fails, etc.. And I think that the OPs Q is legitimate; techniques propagated in Drools Expert without any caveats (e.g., don't do it for more than N rows) should fail gracefully, with an error message such as "after umpteen zillion rules: out of memory" and not just turn belly-up.

After having received some feedback from the OP about alternative approaches I'll report back to the list.

-W



On 18 June 2012 19:26, Vincent LEGENDRE <vincent.legendre@eurodecision.com> wrote:
Did you really send a 50k rows table to a personal email ??? I can't believe it ...
I think you should :
   - read the mailing list rules
   - read the previous Wolfgang post telling that you should consider not using such big tables (consider a rule using your 50k rows as parameters)
   - ask questions that are related to rules, and not java heap size limits ...

De: "zeeshan" <zeeshan.spring@gmail.com>
À: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Envoyé: Lundi 18 Juin 2012 08:19:27
Objet: Re: [rules-users] Hibernate Configuration with Drools 5.4


Hi Laune !

I have mailed you my spreadsheet at ur gmail id.

Thanks !

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Hibernate-Configuration-with-Drools-5-4-tp4017981p4018017.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users