OK, thanks for the confirmation.

Do you have any comments w.r.t. to usability during development (debugging?!) and maintenance? The example is simple enough, but what's your feeling?

-W

On 6 January 2012 08:46, FrankVhh <frank.vanhoenshoven@agserv.eu> wrote:

laune wrote
>
> What I suggested is a non-standard way of rule authoring, and I just think
> that it is possible - I've never tried it.
>

This should work. I tried it once with Drools 5.0, so I assume it is still
OK.

http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n3637269/voc.dsl voc.dsl
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n3637269/Sample.dst Sample.dst
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n3637269/DroolsTest.java
DroolsTest.java

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Template-Key-in-DSL-tp3634710p3637269.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users