Chris Woodrow wrote:
Its "unnaccptable"?  that we don't maintain free community resources at our descretion? If binaries are not available for download, you can always build your own:
http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/tags/

You are right "unacceptable" was not the appropriate word, I am sorry about that and you are right about the own build.

I did know about the priority support on the paid version but I did not know about downloads and QA. Do you mean that paid version does insure backward compatibility?
We use serialisation for deployment so it's hard to ensure backwards compatabilty there - this is why we added the re-build button to the BRMS.. MVEL is also the bad culprit here as it breaks serialisation compatability from minor release to minor release.

In general the paid version is the version that comes as part of the JBoss SOA-P platform, but is available standalone. This binary release is not available publicly and goes through extra levels of QA and interoprability testing.

https://www.redhat.com/apps/store/jboss/rules.html
http://www.redhat.com/jboss/benefits/


Chris


_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users