"extends" is not available with rules generated from decision tables. While
it wouldn't be a big problem to add an option for adding "extends x" to the
rules generated from one table (or even a different extends clause to each
of the rules resulting from a table) I can see a problem for coming to grips
with what the user will need to write for "x".

If "x" is the name of a rule that's defined in a separate DRL: no problem.

But what if the user want to extend a rule from another decision table?
They have names concocted from a user supplied name and the row in
the spreadsheet. The only way to have a reliable reference would be via 
spreadsheet native cell references. 

-W

On 7 September 2012 20:15, lhorton <LHorton@abclegal.com> wrote:
Today's drools blog post (
http://blog.athico.com/2012/09/conditional-named-consequences-in.html )
pointed out a rule option I hadn't noticed: the "extends" option to let one
rule extend another one.  There is little info in the Expert docs about
this, but I tried it out with drl rules and it seems to work beautifully.  I
can see big potential for simplifying some of our currently quite repetitive
rules.  My question:  can this option be used in a decision table and if so,
how?  I don't see any reference to it in the decision table documentation.



--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Can-we-use-rule-extends-option-in-decision-tables-tp4019653.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users