On 16 March 2011 11:52, FrankVhh
<frank.vanhoenshoven@agserv.eu> wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
I was about to report the fact that using drools-verifier 5.2.0 M1 didn't
help, when I saw your comment about checking the error.
Apparently there is something wrong:
### Verifier errors ###
[ERR 101] Line 1:1 no viable alternative at input ':'
Verifier could not form a PackageDescr from the resources that it was trying
to verify.
I do not understand this completely. When I execute the ruleset, it runs as
planned, but this error message seems to imply there is something wrong with
the drl.
Is it a problem that I feed the verifier with
String ruleText =
"C:\\Users\\Frank\\Documents\\DroolsWorkSpaces\\EmpiricalExperiments\\Financial
Rules\\src\\main\\rules\\clearancerules.drl";
verifier.addResourcesToVerify( ResourceFactory.newReaderResource(
new StringReader( ruleText ) ), ResourceType.DRL );
Do the inputs need to be in another format or is there definitely something
wrong in the rules themselves?
Regards,
Frank
--
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-verifier-tp2681002p2687184.html