Hi ,

I am using the last version of drools fusion , what I wanted to achieve is to pack the rules in one "statement" , i.e :

 Event(this after $b && $b after $a)

instead of

Event(this after $b)
Event(this after $a)

that's because I am not limited to the sequence operator , for example when I want to make a disjunction rule :
Cmplx1 :- a OR b

I can't separate the events , but I must write them packed like this ::

 Event(this after $b || $b after this)

One more question :
I assume that the relation between the different statements in a rule is normal conjunction , i.e :

rule "some rule"
when
    a : ...
    b : ...
    c : ...
then
    trigger action "act"
end

would be equivalent to ::
act :- a,b,c .

I hope I am correct ?

Thanks,
Khalil Hafsi