Shannon,
Yes correct, adding "WHITE, MARY" would mean an extra name, different to the other Titles. Another case maybe to still have same number of name but a change of for one person, so "JONES, FRED" is now "CLINTON, BILL".
Do you have a different solution to the one proposed by Wolfgang? I would prefer for the rule to fire once...
Ian Spence
Ian,
Why would '2100-100' fail by adding WHITE, MARY? Is it because you would have an extra (i.e. 3 ) in the list? Is this the test that you are trying to evaluate?
Thanks
Shannon2009/5/14 Ian Spence <ianspence@gmail.com>
Regards,Hello all,--I am new to Drools…
I have a scenario
Each fact object will have the structure:
Title
Proprietor Group
Proprietor Name
E.g.
2100-100
J2 ½ share
SMITH, JOHN
JONES, FRED
T ½ share
BROWN, CHARLIE
2100-101
J2 ½ share
BROWN, CHARLIE
JONES, FRED
T ½ share
SMITH, JOHN
2100-102
T ½ share
BROWN, CHARLIE
J2 ½ share
JONES, FRED
SMITH, JOHN
The group names and the proprietor names must be the same across each Title. The scenario above is a valid case. A failed case would result for Title 2100-100 if we add an extra Proprietor name e.g. WHITE, MARY.
I anticipate having one rule to cater for this. I am hedging towards the ‘collect’ operator but cannot get a clear picture on how to implement it.
Ian Spence
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users