On 5/24/07, Edson Tirelli <tirelli@post.com> wrote:

    Ronald,

    Special characters in the rule names are replaced by '_' as a class will be created with that name. So yes, the given names will generate conflicts.
    I'm not sure we can do much about it, as transparently generating unique names may cause silent unexpected problems.

    For now, my recommendation would be for you to use a valid character to differentiate rule names (like prefixing them with numbers or letters, etc). If you or anyone have any better idea on how to handle such situations, just suggest and we can analyze the viability of implementing it.

    []s
    Edson

2007/5/24, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango@gmail.com >:
All,

I am now getting the following error:

The type Rule_RNR_Qty____RNR_Adjustment_Qty___100__Tolerance_0 is already defined    RtvDecisionEngine/src/rules/com/circuitcity/rtvcrms/rules    rtv.drl    line 758    1180017847586    29221

But I do not have this defined twice, well at least not in my mind. Here are the two rule names that are conflicting:

"RNR Qty == RNR Adjustment Qty : 100% Tolerance"
"RNR Qty >= RNR Adjustment Qty : 100% Tolerance"

So it appears as though the rule names are not taking into account "special" characters.

Is this to be expected?

Ron

--
  Edson Tirelli
  Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
  Office: +55 11 3529-6000
  Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
  JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users