I don't know whether this is the "better (than rule templates) generic way" you
are hinting at, but I've been extending the template mechanism with a feature
permitting expansion from objects - maps or bean-style. This means that
you can take a rule template file and instantiate its rule(s) from a collection of
such objects.

Is this closer to what you're looking for?

-W

2009/3/30 Meny Kobel <meny.kobel@gmail.com>
Hi,
Could you please advice which is the best way to build Drools packages?
I need to read the rules from database and I have to build drools packages.
The content of the rules is very flexible :
1. I don't know the number of rules.
2. I don't know rule data: the type name, operation and value.
3. I do know the maximum number of types and operations the system support.

How should I build the packages:
Should I write component that will read the rules from database and will transform it to drl file?
Any API I can use - Maybe BRMS API?

I'm a ware of "rule templates" but I need a better generic way...

 
Thanks,
Meny

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users