On 10/08/2010 19:53, David Conde wrote:
Just to let people know, I've worked around this by only creating one SessionConfig object and caching it i.e "StatelessKnowledgeSession ksession = kbase.newStatelessKnowledgeSession((KnowledgeSessionConfiguration)getSessionConfig());". 

What seemed to be happening was ChainedProperties was trying Classloader lookups that were very slow when running in an OSGi environment.

Also with how the OSGi bundles are built the org.drools package is split and it makes it difficult to load up certain classes. I ended up having to use reflection to load up the SessionConfiguration class from a specific bundle. Maybe it's to do with how I'm importing the drools bundles into my project but it's one to watch out for if your using drools with OSGi.
in general you shouldn't be looking up concrete implementations, just using what the factory services provide in drools-api; so the split packages shouldn't impact. I made a few of the services avaiable as osgi factory services, see docs for more details.

Mark

Thanks,
Dave 

On 10 August 2010 17:46, David Conde <dconde@calomtech.com> wrote:
ChainedProperties lives in org.drools.util.ChainedProperties and is created in SessionConfiguration(). The call is called during StatelessKnowledgeSession ksession = kbase.newStatelessKnowledgeSession();.


On 10 August 2010 17:36, Pavel Tavoda <pavel.tavoda@gmail.com> wrote:
Can't you avoid using ChainedProperties, what is it? Can you send
piece of code where you create session?

Pavel


2010/8/10 David Conde <dconde@calomtech.com>:
> Hi Pavel,
> I've changed it over to use a stateless session and I'm seeing the
> same behavior. I've done some debugging and it seems to be very slow loading
> up the SessionConfiguration due to all of the loading that happens in
> ChainedProperties.
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
> On 10 August 2010 13:53, Pavel Tavoda <pavel.tavoda@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Interesting. Normally it should be fast. Try to change your patter and
>> load binary compiled serialized package from disk. You can find it in
>> documentation.
>> Also consider using stateless session. Do you really need stateful
>> session?
>>
>> Pavel
>>
>> 2010/8/9 David Conde <dconde@calomtech.com>:
>> > Is it possible that this might be invoking the compiler when a session
>> > is
>> > created? I have all of the init code in the service start call and
>> > stored as
>> > members of the service for reuse but I must create a new knowledge
>> > session
>> > for each run.
>> > Any ideas?
>> > Thanks,
>> > Dave
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Conde <dconde@calomtech.com>
>> > Date: 9 August 2010 11:17
>> > Subject: Re: [rules-users] CPU Spike creating a StatefulKnowledgeSession
>> > using OSGi
>> > To: Rules Users List <rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
>> >
>> >
>> > The line that it spikes on is StatefulKnowledgeSession ksession =
>> > kbase.newStatefulKnowledgeSession();.
>> > Cheers,
>> > Dave
>> >
>> > On 9 August 2010 11:09, Pavel Tavoda <pavel.tavoda@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Is it session creation or rule compilation?
>> >>
>> >> Pavel
>> >>
>> >> 2010/8/9 David Conde <dconde@calomtech.com>:
>> >> > Good Morning,
>> >> > I now have drools running on the Spring DM-Server but I am seeing a
>> >> > CPU
>> >> > spike when creating a StatefulKnowledgeSession. I've tested this
>> >> > outside
>> >> > of
>> >> > an OSGi environment and I don't see the spike. Does anyone know any
>> >> > settings
>> >> > that I can change that might make this go away?
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Dave
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > David Conde
>> >> > CTO Calom Technologies
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > rules-users mailing list
>> >> > rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> rules-users mailing list
>> >> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-users mailing list
>> > rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



--

_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users