1) Correct
2) Correct
3) Correct
4) Correct
5) Correct

Your assumptions are spot on.


On 4 March 2014 23:22, mattmadhavan <mmadhavan@facs.org> wrote:
Hello,
I have some basic questions on the Drools workbench. Can some one please
validate my assumptions?

1) Drools workbench/Guvnor is not a replacement for Eclipse.
2) Geeks like me develop the applications in Eclipse
3) Drools workbench will be mainly used by the Rule authors (Business
Analysts etc) once I set it up for them.
4) The anslysts will author the rules and test it in the workbench.
5) They will build the DRLs into a jar  and I include it as a dependency in
my POM.xml.

How close am I to these assumptions?

Thanks
Matt'M




--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Some-basic-questions-assumptions-on-Drools-Work-bench-Guvnor-tp4028509.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users