_______________________________________________I’m using the latest as of this date, which is 5.0.0M4
Thanks!
Robert CostelloLead Systems EngineerIMA PerformanceE3- 279A847.286.0910
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Edson Tirelli
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 3:59 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools, Grails,and default packages for domain objects
Robert,
What version of Drools are you using?
I remember seeing something about this in the past... I will search JIRAs to see if we have any ticket open for 5.0.
[]s
Edson2009/1/19 Costello, Robert <rcost10@searshc.com>Has anyone else run into issues trying to reference objects in a default package? I'm trying to use Drools with Grails and my rule which compiled nicely in a package setting has issues when faced with a default package.
The error is "foo" cannot be resolved to a type
I've tried putting the rule both in the default package and putting it in a named package, and neither seem to work. If I put my objects back into packages, everything is fine.
Any advice?
Thanks,
Robert Costello
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users