On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:26 AM, tolitius
<webakaunt@gmail.com> wrote:
@Kris,
If every workitem needs to have a "try / catch" block, just to make sure
that all possible exceptions are handled gracefully, would not that be a
framework concern to have a mechanism that _converts_ these exceptions to
some return "error" parameters (just contemplating here) OR to allow a
workitem node to take an ExceptionHandler that would signal an event or
convert it to the result parameter, etc..?
I understand that you are coming from the fact that Java Exceptions are
too low level, and are not Process Exceptions, but they really are :)
[something went "kaboom" within the _Process_] just need to be converted to
ones, and it would be a natural concern for a "Java" framework.
One custom approach that I am thinking about so far is to wrap all
workitems with "AfterThrowing" advice to do just that, but again this rather
feels like a "work around".
Thank you,
/Anatoly
P.S. By the way, would be cool to address real "Java" Exceptions (no matter
what the approach is) in Exception Handling section of the documentation :)
--
View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/How-to-do-Exception-Handling-tp689387p707668.html