Thanks Edson. Is there any example to rewrite
the rule without rule?
From:
rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On
Behalf Of Edson Tirelli
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008
2:59 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools,
Performance issues on 4.0.7 Vs 2.5
Start by eliminating the evals and writing your constraints
properly inside the patterns. Drools 3+ is orders of magnitude faster than
Drools 2.x, but you need to leverage its power in your rules. Please read the
manual as the version 3 was a completely rewrite of version 2. Version 4 is an
improvement over 3.
As an example, look at this: http://blog.athico.com/2006/11/rush-hour-and-content-based-routing.html
[]s
Edson
2008/9/5 Rout, Sushanta (ThoughtMill) <Sushanta.Rout@ihg.com>
We were using Drools 2.5 version earlier. Now we have switched to
drools
4.0.7. But we see significant
issues with performance like drools 4.0.7
is three times slower than 2.5 . Has anybody encountered the issue?
Here is a sample of the rule, we have some more similar to this.
rule "test"
dialect "java"
activation-group "group1"
when
$croNumberDetailsRequest
: CRONumberDetailsRequest()
$resdirectPhoneNumber :
ResdirectPhoneNumber()
eval($resdirectPhoneNumber.getType().getId() == 5 &&
$resdirectPhoneNumber.isValidForBrand($croNumberDetailsRequest.getBrand(
)) &&
$croNumberDetailsRequest.getRegion() != null &&
$resdirectPhoneNumber.isValidRegion($croNumberDetailsRequest.getRegion()
) &&
$croNumberDetailsRequest.getLocale() != null &&
$resdirectPhoneNumber.isValidForLocaleId($croNumberDetailsRequest.getLoc
ale()) &&
$resdirectPhoneNumber.isValidSlot($croNumberDetailsRequest.getSlot()));
then
ResultList.add($resdirectPhoneNumber);
end
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com