On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:46 AM, djb
<dbrownell83@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Hi all,
I know there are some basic ways to chain rules together, by
setting flags
in consequences that are checked in the conditions of other
rules...
but in a large system based on rule templates, where
thousands of rules are
generated, it is not feasible to chain rules in this manner,
especially when
they are chained in a somewhat arbitrary fashion
(eg. True if Rule 130 AND Rule 200 AND Rule 480 fire)
has anyone had this situation before? would I need to
execute this as a
post-processing step? or, is there any design pattern that
will allow rules
to be chained, preferably in a manageable way?
regards,
Daniel
--
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Chained-Rules-tp775491p775491.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
"To understand what is recursion you must first understand
recursion"