> <mailto:
jliu@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> A new feature called "Sharable artifacts/Global artifacts" will be
> available in Drools 5.1. This feature allows you share an
> asset among
> different packages. It also creates a global area (you can
> consider it
> as a global package). Potentially you can promote an asset
> that you
> think is more appropriate to be defined in a global scope from
> your
> current package to the global area, so that this global asset
> can be
> reused by every package. This feature is already on trunk,
> maybe you
> want to give it a try. Any comments or feedbacks will be highly
> appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
> Jervis
>
>
> Amit Kumar wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I am looking to organize the rules in different categories.
> But for
> > distribution purposes We are creating packages for different
> > roles/processing phases
> >
> > So a rule will reside in one pckage but for navigation it
> can belong
> > to multiple categories
> >
> > So packages are like Shirts, Pants, Shoes, Sweaters
> > Categories are Color, Material, Size, Gender and those have sub
> > categories witin them
> >
> > We have rules which will device the category of the item
> > Like "red rule", "blue rule", "cloth rule", leather rule"
> >
> > Now the problem we are facing is for category rules is if I
> define the
> > rule in Shirt package .. then I will not be able ot use it
> in Pant
> > package.. Will have to redefine it.
> >
> > The other problem in this scenario is If I have a price rule
> in Shirt
> > package and the category is "Blue Color" and "XL Size" then
> I will
> > have to put it in both categories
> > When I put the "Blue Rule" on "Blue Category" and "XL Rule"
> on "XL
> > Category" and I put the rule in both categories.. will it
> be an "and"
> > relationship or will be an "OR"
> >
> > Regards,
> > Amit
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list